In positivism, what counts as empirical? Is it the readings of instruments, or the notes on a notebook or computer, or is it the sense perceptions of an experimenter? There certainly is the case we can have no direct experience of any of those things, not even the mind of a fellow experimenter. What about the objection that empirical observations — whatever they "really" are — are theory-laden and need to be interpreted to make any sense?
closed as off topic by dmckee♦ Jul 23 '12 at 13:57
Questions on Physics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to physics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.