Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Approaching the following question

Imagine we have a collection of $N = 100$ simple harmonic oscillators. The total internal energy is $U = q \epsilon$ where $q$ is the number of energy quanta. Assume $q >> N >> 1$. If we double the internal energy, by how much will the entropy of the collection change?

The question was originally found here under Question 5.

The answer is $\sigma_{final} - \sigma_{initial} = 69.3$

How is this determined?

I know $S = k_b ln \Omega$, where $S$ is entropy, $\Omega$ is the number of micro-states, $\sigma = \frac{ 1}{ \Omega}$, $k_b$ is the Boltzmann constant.

I know $<energy> = 1/2 k T$ per quadradic term.

I know $\frac{ 1}{ T} \equiv \frac{ \partial S}{\partial U}$

But how does doubling energy effect entropy? Specifically, what equation am I looking for to determine this?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

You have $$U=N\langle E \rangle=N\ (\langle E_\text{kin} \rangle+\langle E_\text{pot} \rangle)=N k\ T,$$ $$\tfrac{\partial S(U)}{\partial U}=\tfrac{1}{k\ T}=\tfrac{N}{U}\ \ \Longrightarrow\ \ S(U)=N \ln(U)+S_0,$$ $$\Delta S=S(x\ U)-S(U)=N\ln(x\ U)-N\ln(U)=N \ln(x).$$ And $$100 \ln(2)=69.315...$$

share|improve this answer
    
What do you mean by the "the way you rewrite the question, we have to look up the source anyway."? –  rudolph9 Jul 22 '12 at 22:03
    
@rudolph9: The thread you posted an hour ago doesn't contain the question "What is the temperature?" but only the phrase "Why is the answer $T= \dots\ $ ?" and here the $\sigma$ is mentioned but not involved in the formulation of the question. –  NikolajK Jul 22 '12 at 22:05
    
Sorry, I have a bad tendency to see what I wanted to write rather than what I actually wrote (I went ahead and updated the other question) and I am not particularly framilar with conventions for greek letters in physics. Please leme know if other changes are needed. –  rudolph9 Jul 22 '12 at 22:10
    
Also on the note of the $sigma$, the answer was given as $\sigma_{final} - \sigma_{initial} = 69.3$ –  rudolph9 Jul 22 '12 at 22:12
    
Your answer definitely make way more sense! –  rudolph9 Jul 22 '12 at 22:15

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.