Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

During a standard derivation of the eigenvalues of the angular momentum operators, $J^2$ and $J_z$, where

$$J^2|\alpha, \beta\rangle =\hbar^2\alpha|\alpha, \beta\rangle$$


$$J_z|\alpha, \beta\rangle =\hbar\beta|\alpha, \beta\rangle$$

one can show that $\alpha \geq\beta^2$. Textbooks at this point say that there must exist $\beta_{max}$ for a given $\alpha$.

My question is, why cannot we say, based on the last inequality, that $\beta_{max}=\sqrt{\alpha}$?

share|cite|improve this question

The reason that the equality cannot be attained except for the trivial case $\alpha = 0$ is the noncommutativity of the spin operators.

If the equality is true then we would have $J_x^2|\alpha, \beta \rangle = 0$ and the same for $J_y$. This would imply that both $J_x$ and $ J_y$ must be represented by the zero matrix in this Hilbert space, but then the commutation relation:

$[J_x, J_y]= i \hbar J_z$

cannot be satisfied.

share|cite|improve this answer

You can't just turn an inequality into an equality. If I tell you $x \ge y$, it's not necessarily true that $y = x$.

If you follow the derivations in these textbooks a little further, they should show that $\alpha = \beta_\text{max}(\beta_\text{max} + 1)$, using your notation. So it turns out that $\alpha$ is not even a square number, in general, and thus $\beta_\text{max}\neq\sqrt\alpha$. $\beta_\text{max}$ is simply the largest integer or half-integer (as appropriate) which satisfies the condition.

share|cite|improve this answer
I did not turn an inequality into an equality, I said that y is bounded from above by x, hence the maximum possible value for y must be x. – Revo Jul 21 '12 at 7:18
That is not true, the maximum possible value for $y$ may be less than $x$, the bound should not necessarily be saturated! In this particular case, besides two equalities, you give, there is also $(J^2-J_z^2-J_z)\left|\alpha,\beta_{max}\right>=J_{-}J_{+}\left|\alpha,\beta_{ma‌​x}\right>=0$ giving you $\alpha=\beta_{max}(\beta_{max}+1)$. – straups Jul 21 '12 at 8:52
@Revo you started with $\alpha\ge\beta^2$ and concluded that $\alpha = \beta_\text{max}^2$. That's turning an inequality into an equality. As my answer and straups' comment both say, the only conclusion you can correctly draw is that $\alpha\ge\beta_\text{max}^2$. – David Z Jul 21 '12 at 21:51

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.