Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How to derive the selection rules $\Delta L= \pm 1$, $\Delta S=0$ for electron spectroscopy?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

these are selection rules for the electric dipole radiation. The transition from the excited state to a lower state of an atom is governed by the following matrix element: $$C \cdot \langle f | \hat{p} | i\rangle$$ You could also write the sum of positions of electrons $\Sigma\hat{r}$ instead of their total momentum $\hat{p}$ in the middle. This simple form of the operator in the middle is because at low enough frequencies, i.e. long enough wavelength, the atom simply finds itself in a uniform field, anf the electric potential $\phi$ for a uniform field is linear in $\hat{r}$. Equivalently, the matrix element may be converted from $\hat{r}$ to $\hat{p}$ and vice versa by realizing that the commutator of the Hamiltonian with $\hat{x}$ is proportional to $\hat{p}$.

At any rate, the operator in the middle is a 3-dimensional vector that only acts on the positions or momenta of the electrons, not their spins. So it has to commute with the total spin operator $\hat{S}$ of the electrons, and $\Delta S=0$ as a consequence.

On the other hand, it is a vector, i.e. a $j=1$ object as far as the SO(3) transformations go, and by combining its $j=1$ angular momentum with the orbital angular momentum $L_i$ of the initial state, you may get the final $L_f$ being $L_i\pm 1$ or $L_i$ according to the basic rules of the addition of angular momentum. You may imagine that you're just adding two vectors of specified lengths, $L_i$ and $1$, and depending on their relative angle, the length of the sum may go from $L_i-1$ to $L_i+1$.

Your list didn't allow $L_f=L_i$ and I think you are right that it is typically forbidden as well because it violates parity. The angular momentum to parity goes like $(-1)^L$, I guess, but because the vector operator is parity-odd, the initial and final states have to differ by their parity as well, which means that only $\Delta L=\pm 1$ is allowed. Everyone, please correct me if I am saying something incorrectly.

Best wishes Lubos

share|improve this answer
    
essentially at low frequencies is permissible to make a mean field approximation and treat it as a perturbation. Is that right? –  Andrea Amoretti Jan 18 '11 at 14:02
    
Yes, absolutely. Of course, the mean field approximation won't see that one has emitted a photon but it doesn't matter - the changed state of the atom knows about this thing. The low-frequency is related to the fact that the dipole is enough - the $\cos(x)$ wave may be expanded and only the linear terms matter at the distance scales of the atom. –  Luboš Motl Jan 19 '11 at 13:48
    
What I can't figure out is why I'm the only person who's upvoted this since it was written a month and a half ago. Am I the only person who goes around upvoting things? Hmmmmmmm.. Turns out that I am: physics.stackexchange.com/users?tab=voters&filter=all and the only one who upvotes competing answers: physics.stackexchange.com/badges/28/electorate –  Carl Brannen Mar 7 '11 at 4:51
    
@CarlBrannen: I totally agree with you that this answer should receive more upvotes. I did my part ;) –  Philipp Feb 20 '12 at 23:28
    
What is going to happen if spin orbit interaction is considered where spin and orbit momentum are neither good quantum number? –  Laurent Mar 27 at 23:20
show 1 more comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.