Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm reading a book about string theory, and it describes anthropic principle. Idea is clear to me, I understand this principle describes certain constants in modern physics that are so fine tuned as if to imply the existence of a creator.

I also understand how this is not true if we imagine multiverse where each universe contains different sets of rules and constants thus leading to different physical laws, where infinite amount of universes exist 1 could easily turn out to match ours.

But why is it called Anthropic principle, or better yet why Anthropic?

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off topic by Qmechanic, David Z Aug 30 '12 at 17:46

Questions on Physics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to physics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

up vote 0 down vote accepted

The word comes from the ancient Greek meaning "pertaining to man;" 'man' here means human. The etymologyonline dictionary is helpful. The Anthropic Principle is so-named because it is fundamentally based on the fact of a human observer.

share|cite|improve this answer
So Anthropic Principle describes universe that is made for humans. and hence the name... got it. – Sandro Dzneladze Jul 18 '12 at 21:13
No. Anthropic principle means that the universe is as we see it, because if it weren't, we wouldn't be asking the question. – AdamRedwine Jul 19 '12 at 12:00
The reason it is called "anthropic" is because the "human" observer is the central component of the argument. If there were no human observer, it would not be possible to make the anthropic principle argument. Bit of a catch 22 really. It DOES NOT mean that the universe was "made for humans." It means that the universe does support humans, for whatever reason, and that fact is necessary for humans to question the nature of the universe. There is no possible universe that would not support human life that would contain humans asking the question "Why doesn't the universe support human life?" – AdamRedwine Jul 19 '12 at 12:01

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.