Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I understand that a small proportion of events at the LHC that would not trigger on any deterministic trigger are saved on what might be called a random trigger, so that, amongst other uses, proposed new triggers can be tested. What proportion of events are saved on deterministic and on random triggers? Also, how much is that data used and for what other purposes?

This question was prompted by a Cosmic Variance Post,, where this question may also be found.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Random triggers (or at least those uncorrellated with the data (many experiments use one pulse per second called "1PPS" for this purpose); I think CMS calls them "zero bias") give you an unambiguous measurement of things that might contaminate the data. Electronics noise, cosmics rates, radio-contamination of the detector elements are some of the things which can be extracted this way.

Further, when you have a information discarding trigger (as the big collider experiments must (their data rates are sky-high as it is)), you will generally also take some un-filtered or lightly filtered triggers. These are to allow you to measure (rather than calculating on a theoretical basis) the efficiencies related to the way in which the trigger discards information. CMS calls one set of these their "minimum bias" triggers.

Trigger design is a major part of designing high-rate experiments and has lots of statistics and not a little art to it.

share|cite|improve this answer
Only a partial answer, but still useful. Thanks. Is "1PPS" the rate parameter of an exponential distribution, or is it a precise timing? – Peter Morgan Jul 14 '12 at 15:40
To learn the details about what fraction CMS in particular is taking for zero-bias and minimum-bias you will probably have to wait until they get around to writing a paper about the trigger (and they will if they haven't already)...look for it in Nuclear Instruments and Methods. Experiments that use a 1PPS trigger buy a commercial off the shelf "pulser" (an electronics debugging tool that sends one Pulse Per Second) and plug it into the front panel of the DAQ. I'd bet that CMS takes a lower rate than that because their data rates are so high and their channel count is so large. – dmckee Jul 14 '12 at 15:48
I think that's enough to satisfy my curiosity. Thanks. – Peter Morgan Jul 14 '12 at 15:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.