Sign up ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

As we know, the Higgs boson gives mass to other particles. But here is onething which is not clear for me. I mean, I do not understand how the Higgs boson gives mass to other particles? Does anyone could explain me more explicitly how procedure goes that the Higgs boson gives mass to other particles.

share|cite|improve this question
It is not the higgs boson that gives mass to other particles, but the higgs mechanism : . I'll give you some points anyway so you will be allowed comments. –  anna v Jul 13 '12 at 6:12
Have you made up your mind on what "mass" of a particle means to you in that question? Maybe that will help. –  NikolajK Jul 13 '12 at 7:28
Possible duplicate: –  Qmechanic Aug 15 '13 at 6:56

2 Answers 2

Please read my recent article Mass generation via the Higgs boson and the quark condensate of the QCD vacuum by Martin Schumacher

In essence:

The Higgs boson, recently discovered with a mass of 125.7 GeV is known to mediate the masses of elementary particles, but only 2% of the mass of the nucleon. Extending a previous investigation and including the strange-quark sector, hadron masses are derived from the quark condensate of the QCD vacuum and from the effects of the Higgs boson. These calculations include the π meson, the nucleon and the scalar mesons σ(600), κ(800), a0(980) $f_0(980)$ and $f_0(1370)$. The predicted second σ meson $σ′(1344)=|s\bar{s}⟩$, is investigated and identified with the $f_0(1370)$ meson. An outlook is given on the hyperons Λ, $Σ^{0,±}$ and $Ξ^{0,-}$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Welcome to Physics! Whilst this may theoretically answer the question, it would be preferable to include the essential parts of the answer here, and provide the link for reference. –  Kyle Kanos Jun 22 at 12:52

The Higgs mechanism gives mass to the spin-1/2 particles in the standard model by forming a condensate which allows particles with different charge to swap helicity. In quantum field theory, a fermionic spin-1/2 particle comes in two helicities, the spin along the direction of motion, and if the helicity doesn't change, that particle is massless. A massive spin-1/2 particle consists of two helicities swapping with each other, and the mass is the rate of helicity swapping. In order to produce a massive spin-1/2 particle, you need two particles of opposite helicity with the same charges, which can flip into each other without violating charge conservation.

This is not the case in the standard model--- the fermions each have different charges, so they can't be massive. But once you have a Higgs condensate, the fermions can flip into each other by absorbing a Higgs condensate particle, thereby changing their charge, and simultaneously flipping the helicity. This process pairs up the quarks and the leptons into pairs which together have a mass. This mass is the helicity flipping rate, and it is determined by the condensate energy density (the Higgs vacuum expectation value) and the degree to which each fermion interacts with the condensate.

For the W and Z gauge bosons, which get mass from the Higgs mechanism a different way, their mass is the Higgs mechanism itself, which is explained on Wikipedia. The Higgs condensate is superconducting for the type of charges which the W and Z are force carriers for, and the relativistically invariant analog of the Meissner effect makes the W and Z bosons short-ranged in the vacuum, just as the ordinary Meissner effect makes the electromagnetic interaction short-ranged in a superconductor.

The Higgs boson is the quantum particle associated with the shaking of the left-over radial component of the condensate field, after the angular parts of the field are absorbed by the gauge bosons. This left-over part still interacts with the fermions proportionally to their mass, so you can tell that the Higgs mechanism is giving mass to the particles just from the predictions this gives for the interaction with the Higgs boson.

share|cite|improve this answer
This explanation is written in english, its amazing. Thank you. –  kηives Mar 1 '13 at 1:27
@Ron Maimon: you made a confusion between helicity and chirality in your explanations. –  Paganini Jun 22 at 19:54
@Paganini: I never distinguished between the two until recently! I used the terms interchangeably until someone corrected me here. But since the massless fermions of given helicity are of a fixed helicity, it doesn't make much difference, so I hope you can forgive me. –  Ron Maimon Jun 24 at 3:43

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.