Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

From the illustrations at the New Horizons website it seems that Pluto may be in or near the ecliptic plane when New Horizons passes by.

Is this intentional? Of course Pluto was to move to that position whether the Earthlings send a probe or not, but was the probe sent at a time to coincide with Pluto's pass through the ecliptic plane? My line of thought is that it would require less energy to get to ~40 AU in the ecliptic plane as the launchpoint (Earth) already has some velocity in that plane. Also, while travelling in the ecliptic plane the probe might happen upon other interesting things on the way (asteroids).

share|improve this question
    
"My line of thought is that it would require less energy to get to ~40 AU in the ecliptic plane as the launchpoint (Earth) already has some velocity in that plane." Energy is a scalar. It doesn't have direction. The idea you want is "change in velocity" (or as space flight people would say "delta-V"). –  dmckee Jul 12 '12 at 14:08
    
@dmckee: I refer to the amount of energy required to move a device from 1 AU distance from the Sun to 40 AU distance from the Sun (due to the increase in gravity potential from the Sun). That energy requirement would go down as Delta-V goes down, but equipping the craft with more Delva-V capacity would be the method by which more energy is invested in getting to that distance (in the form of rocket fuel). –  dotancohen Jul 13 '12 at 12:21

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

You are right in stating that it's mostly a matter of energy, but...there is more to it.

Pluto's huge distance makes it impractical (and rather expensive) to change the orbital inclination. The Ulysses spacecraft had a huge inclination to the ecliptic, which required a complicated maneuver near Jupiter to attain. Such a maneuver introduces additional risk, is more expensive, and most of all, unnecessary for this mission's goals:

  • Pluto will be near the ecliptic at the time of arrival, which was part of the reason to launch at the time it was launched
  • New Horizon's very high speed, necessary to make it to Pluto in a reasonable amount of time, make it completely impossible to enter orbit around Pluto anyway (for which an inclination change is mandatory).

It is also undesirable for its secondary mission goals:

  • After the Pluto encounter, it is the intension to push on to the Kuiper belt (which some would even call the main mission)

The Kuiper belt is mostly uncharted, although there are a few known candidate objects being considered for New Horizons to visit. The belt is however expected from an orbital evolution point of view to lie mostly near the ecliptic. New Horizons will therefore have the largest probability to discover new objects, and information about the Kuiper belt in general, if it flies close to the ecliptic.

So, in conclusion: the only technically feasible and affordable option to do in situ measurements of Pluto was to do it in a single fly by, and with less than 8 weeks contact time, of which only a few minutes will in the end be relevant for all the Nature publications that will follow from the mission. The probe will then fly on to visit some Kuiper belt object(s), which are all known to be constrained to a relatively narrow band around the ecliptic. If a significant inclination change had been given to visit Pluto at a different time or under different conditions, this would not have been possible, decreasing the overall expected scientific output and therefore pretty directly also the likelihood of it getting funded.

share|improve this answer

I'd say most spacecraft are sent in the ecliptic plane, so they can make use of gravitational pull and visit planets, asteroids, etc. Therefore, if they want to visit Pluto, they have to do it when Pluto is in the ecliptic. It would probably be possible to aim at Pluto on a different point of its orbit, but it would be a far less interesting voyage.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.