Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

is well known that composition of point reflections generate pure displacements. This implies that the commutator of two point reflections will be a pure displacement. Are there similar elemental transformation operations which can generate pure displacements from their anticommutators?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

This question is not well posed. I'm not sure what exactly you intend addition/subtraction of point reflections to mean, since this depends on the objects that the point reflection operators are acting on. In general the commutator of two point reflections is not a translation. For example, consider reflections acting on one-dimensional functions. Let P be reflection about the point p and Q be the same about the point q. Then

$$ PQf(x) = f(x-(p-q)) \\ QPf(x) = f(x-(q-p)) $$ $$[P,Q]f(x) =(PQ-QP)f(x) = f(x-p+q) - f(x-q+p)$$

If you take, for example $f(x) = x$, then $[P,Q]x = x-p+q-x+q-p = 2(q-p)$. This constant is clearly not a translation of $x$.

share|cite|improve this answer
I was wondering about this myself. – David Z Jul 10 '12 at 4:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.