Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Quantum Electrodynamics by Landau and Lifshiz there is the following:

The correspondence between the spinor $\zeta^{\alpha \dot{\beta}}$ and the 4-vector is a particular case of a general rule: any symmetrical spinor of rank $(k,k)$ is equivalent to a symmetrical 4-tensor of rank $k$ which is irreducible (i.e. which gives zero upon contraction with respect to any pair of indices).

L&L also writes out this for a 4-vector $$ \zeta^{1\dot{1}}=\zeta_{2\dot{2}}=a^3+a^0 ,\quad \zeta^{2\dot{2}}=\zeta_{1\dot{1}}=a^0-a^3, $$ $$ \zeta^{1\dot{2}}=-\zeta_{2\dot{1}}=a^1-ia^2 ,\quad \zeta^{2\dot{1}}=-\zeta_{1\dot{2}}=a^1+ia^2, $$

Surely there must be an established method to do this in general just like it says above. I would like to know this method, so if someone would be kind enough to show me or refer me to a reference I would be grateful, (e.g. suppose I would like to know the components for $\zeta^{\alpha\beta\dot{\gamma}\dot{\delta}}$ in terms of the symmetric traceless rank-2, 4-tensor).

Thanks,

share|improve this question
    
You might want to look into Penrose and Rindler's Spinors and Space-Time which looks into this in great detail (it's what the two volumes are entirely about!). –  Alex Nelson Jul 9 '12 at 4:51
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The method is to contract every index with the $\sigma$ four vector:

$$ \sigma^\mu_{\alpha\dot{\beta}}$$

Where $\sigma^0$ is the identity, and $\sigma^i$ for i=1,2,3 is the Pauli spin matrix.

If you have a symmetric tensor with all lower indices, you contract each $\mu$ index with a sigma, and you get the dotted-undotted form.

$$ M_{\mu\nu} \sigma^\mu_{\alpha\dot{\beta}}\sigma^\nu_{\alpha'\dot{\beta}'} = M_{\alpha\alpha'\dot{\beta}\dot{\beta}'} $$

If M is symmetric on $\mu$ and $\nu$, this is symmetric under permutations of the pairs of corresponding dotted and undotted indices simultaneously. It is not symmetric under separate permutations of the dotted and undotted indices.

$$ M_{\alpha\alpha'\dot{\beta}\dot{\beta}'} = M_{\alpha'\alpha\dot{\beta}'\dot{\beta}}$$

But this is because I haven't implemented tracelessness. The inner product of two vectors in spinor form is given by using $\epsilon$ tensors:

$$ V_{\alpha\dot{\alpha}} V_{\beta\dot{\beta}} \epsilon^{\alpha\beta}\epsilon^{\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta}}$$

If you make the contraction of M with g zero, in spinor form, this tells you that

$$ M_{\alpha\beta\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta}} - M_{\beta\alpha\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta}} = 0$$

Which together with the previous condition tells you that the M in spinor form is symmetric under separate permutations of the two indices. The higher rank proof is exactly the same.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks Ron. Should the $\beta$s in the second line be dotted? –  kηives Jul 9 '12 at 19:03
    
@kηives: Yes, I'll fix it. I was suspended and couldn't do it. –  Ron Maimon Jul 10 '12 at 19:33
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.