Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Question goes as

Show that the solutions to the Maxwell's equations $$ \nabla \times \vec H = \frac 1 c \frac{\partial \vec E}{\partial t}+\frac {4\pi} c \vec J, \hspace{ 2 mm} \nabla \times \vec E = -\frac 1 c \frac{\partial \vec H}{\partial t}, \hspace{ 2 mm} \nabla \cdot \vec H = 0, \hspace{ 2 mm} \nabla \cdot \vec E = 4 \pi \rho $$ are given by $$ \vec E = -\nabla \phi - \frac 1 c \frac{\partial \vec A}{\partial t}, \hspace{2mm} \vec H = \nabla \times \vec A,$$ where $ \phi$ and $\vec A$ are scalar potential and vector potential respectively which satisfy the equations $$ 1) \nabla \cdot \vec A + \frac 1c \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} = 0 $$ $$2) \nabla^2 \phi - \frac 1 {c^2} \frac{\partial ^2 \phi}{\partial t^2} = -4\pi \rho $$ $$3) \nabla^2 \vec A - \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial ^2 \vec A}{\partial t^2}= -\frac {4\pi} c \vec J$$

Hint requested thank you!!
Also what kind of regions is described by $$ \nabla \cdot \vec E = 4 \pi \rho?$$ It is uniformly charged region?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Unless I'm missing something, all you have to do is substitute the solution you're given into Maxwell's equations and confirm the solution satisfies the equations.

For example you're given the solution $\vec H = \nabla \times \vec A$. Substitute this into $\nabla \cdot \vec H = 0$ and you get:

$$ \nabla \cdot (\nabla \times \vec A) = 0 $$

and this is true because div of curl is always zero.

Re comment: we make a point of not doing homework for you because your professor wouldn't be amused. You need to start working away at the equations and post here if you get stuck, giving the details of what's blocking you.

I showed the solution you're given satisfies $\nabla \cdot \vec H = 0$ because that's pretty trivial. I suggest you next tackle $\nabla \cdot \vec E = 4 \pi \rho$. Note that you're given:

$$ \nabla^2 \phi - \frac 1 {c^2} \frac{\partial ^2 \phi}{\partial t^2} = -4\pi \rho $$

so you just have to show that:

$$ -\nabla \cdot \vec E = \nabla^2 \phi - \frac 1 {c^2} \frac{\partial ^2 \phi}{\partial t^2} $$

You can do this using the information you're given in the question. A clue is that div of grad is del squared.

share|cite|improve this answer
yeah that's the only part i know!! ... how to get that $ \vec E$ part – Santosh Linkha Jul 1 '12 at 12:14

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.