Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A question is given as

Consider a fluid of density $ \rho(x, y, z, t) $ which moves with velocity $v(x, y, z, t) $ without sources or sink. Show that $ \nabla \cdot \vec J + \frac{\partial \rho }{\partial t} = 0 ;$ where $ \vec J = \rho \vec v \hspace{0.5 cm}$ ( $\vec v$ being velocity of fluid and $ \rho $ density).

In the solution it assumes, $ - \nabla \cdot \vec J $ is the change in $ \vec J$ within the volume element which should be equal to $ \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}$ (why equal?). I don't understand this part and I doubt if this question is correct. I think the question should be $$ \rho (\nabla \cdot \vec v) + \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = 0$$ Is the question correct? If it's correct help me to understand the solution (if it's right) or please provide me correct answer. Thank you!!

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

The continuity equation without sink and sources reads

$$\frac{\partial \rho }{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (\rho\vec v) ~=~ 0.$$

Hint on how to derive it:

  1. Establish first the integral form of the continuity equation for an arbitrary (sufficiently regular) 3D spatial integration region.

  2. Next use the definition of the 3D divergence to argue the differential form of the continuity equation.

The continuity equation can be rewritten with the help of a material derivative $\frac{D \rho }{D t}$ as

$$\frac{D \rho }{D t} + \rho \nabla \cdot \vec v ~=~ 0.$$

Thus for an incompressible fluid $\nabla \cdot \vec v = 0$, the density $\rho$ of a certain fluid parcel does not change as a function of time.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.