Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In a book of "LES HOUCHES - Critical Phenomena, Random systems, Gauge theories" the author Frolich says that:

2D

In two dimensions, the mean energy of an isolated point defect in a square area of diameter $L$ is proportional to $\log(L)$. The total number of possible positions is proportional to $L^2$, i.e. the entropy grows logarithmically in $L$. Hence the free energy behaves like:

$F=E-TS \sim \textrm{const.} \log(L)-kT \textrm{const.}^\prime \log(L)$

Thus, for $T$ large enough, a dilute system of bound point defects becomes unstable in the thermodynamic limit, i.e. defects unbind and form a plasma

3D

In three dimensions, dislocations are line defects with a self-energy roughly proportional to their lenght, $L$. In a cubic area of diameter $\sim \textrm{const.} L$ the number of possible configurations of a single dislocation loop of lenght $L$ is clearly proportional to $\exp(\textrm{const.} L)$, so the entropy grows linearly in $L$. The free energy thus behaves like

$F \sim \textrm{const.} L - kT \textrm{const.}^\prime L$

I have not understood the following points:

  1. What is the qualitative argument that says that the mean energy of a point defect in a square is $∼\log(L)$?

  2. The same question of 1. for the 3D case.

  3. How he derives the proportionality of $\exp(\textrm{const.} L)$ ?

  4. The same question of 3. for the 2D case

  5. How can he says that for $T$ large the system of point defects is unstable in the thermodynamic limit?

  6. In 2D he speaks of "mean energy" in 3D of "self-energy". Why does he make this difference?

Thanks!

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.