Tell me more ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 0 down vote favorite

My friend and me are working on DNA computing and on some improvements to it. Of course, we are working on computing aspects of this branch. So, we have insufficient knowledge about physics and chemical sides of that. We think at this time DNA computing has bin stop and has no new improvements. Because DNA computing method can increase parallelizing in computation. But we still have previous constraints like Newman and Turing architecture in joining forked parts of problems and so. Have you any hope in this method of computation? And at last which id the winner? DNA computing or Quantum computation?

share|improve this question
Hi Erfankam, and welcome to Physics Stack Exchange! This is a rather subjective and vague question; you're not asking something specific about quantum computing. So it's not really appropriate for this site in its current form. However, if you edit it to be a more focused question, I'll be happy to reopen it. – David Zaslavsky♦ May 10 '12 at 20:58
DNA computing "wins" in the sense that it is implemented today, but theoretically, it can't solve factoring as well as a quantum computer for large enough factors. – Ron Maimon May 11 '12 at 6:12

closed as not constructive by David Zaslavsky♦ May 10 '12 at 20:53

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, see the FAQ for guidance.