Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In their celebrated work, Capelli Itzykson and Zuber established an ADE-classification of modular invariant CFTs with chiral algebra $\mathfrak{su}(2)_k$.

How much of that classification can one see using the tools of perturbative quantum field theory?

Presumably, one can't see the exceptional $E_6$, $E_7$, $E_8$ family...
what about the $A_n$ versus $D_n$ families?

share|improve this question
    
André, I am not familiar with these results, but is there a Lagrangian description of these models? Or is that the question? –  Pavel Safronov Nov 26 '11 at 15:06
    
@Pavel: Yes, that's exactly the question. –  André Nov 26 '11 at 15:51
    
I guess you already knew things I wrote in my answer. So, can you elaborate on what exactly you mean by "the tools of perturbative QFT"? What is the theory you want to perturb around? –  Pavel Safronov Nov 28 '11 at 15:32

2 Answers 2

The following facts might be useful to OP. Firstly, the simple simply-laced $ADE$ Lie groups are in one-to-one correspondence with finite subgroups $\Gamma$ of $SU(2)$. Secondly, for $c=1$ CFTs, the $ADE$ classification is realized by orbifold models based upon modding out string propagation on a $SU(2)$ group manifold by its finite subgroups $\Gamma$, see Ref. 1 and Ref. 2, Chap.8. Thirdly, models of the $\hat{sl}(2)$ affine Kac-Moody algebra are discussed in Ref. 2, Chap.9.

Some References:

  1. P. Ginsparg, Curiosities at $c = 1$, Nucl. Phys. B 295 (1988) 153.

  2. P. Ginsparg, Applied Conformal Field Theory, arXiv:hep-th/9108028.

share|improve this answer
    
Very useful indeed. I'm in the process of learning all that stuff, and references to good, comprehensive sources are always welcome. This does not, however, address the question: the theories that I mentioned above have central charge $c=3(h-2)/h$, where $h$ is the (dual) Coxeter number. –  André Nov 26 '11 at 19:34
    
I updated the answer with a pointer to Chapter 9 in Ginsparg's lectures. –  Qmechanic Nov 26 '11 at 20:48
    
The answer here is talking about another ADE classification in CFT, which comes from the orbifolds of $SU(2)_1$ that are given by finite subgroups of $SU(2)$ (or $SO(3)$) and which are in one-to-one correspondence with ADE graphs by the McKay correspondence. –  Marcel Nov 27 '11 at 12:02

The $A_n$ family is obtained by considering the usual WZW action for $G=SU(2)$ and $k=n-1$. A well-known example is the free boson at $R=\sqrt{2}$, it corresponds to an $A_2$ model: its partition function is a sum of characters for spin-0 and spin-1/2 representations.

The $D_{2\rho+2}$ and $D_{2\rho+1}$ families correspond to twisting the above theories by the non-trivial outer automorphism of $\hat{A}_1$, it turns out you can do that only for even levels.

Besides Ginsparg's lectures, you can take a look at chapter 17 in Di Francesco et al. book.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.