Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The quantum mechanics of Coloumb-force bound states of atomic nuclei and electrons lead to the extremely rich theory of molecules. In particular, I think the richness of the theory is related to the large mass ratio between the nucleon and the electron. This mass ratio leads to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation which gives rise to a complicated effective potential for the nuclei which posses many local minima: the molecules.

I wonder whether there are analogical phenomena in which the bound states are gravitational. It seems that if we take a collection of electrically neutral molecules and neutrinos, it should be possible to form a large number of bound states, in particular because of the large (not so long ago deemed infinite) mass ratio between molecules and neutrions. Of course neutrinos are highly relativistic and I can't tell how it affects things.

Now, even if we leave neutrinos alone, the typical size of such a bound state is

$$\frac{\hbar^2}{G m^3}$$

where $m$ is proton mass. Google calculator reveals this to be 3.8 million light years. Holy moly! However, this is still much smaller than the observable universe. Can there be places in the universe sufficiently empty to contain such bound states? What would be the effect of general relativistic phenomena (expansion of space)? EDIT: I guess no place is sufficiently empty at least because background radiation is everywhere. Maybe these creatures will become relevant in a very distant future when the background radiation cools off considerably?

Summing up:

What is known about the quantum mechanics of gravitational bound states of electrically neutral molecules and neutrinos?

I'm tagging the question as "quantum gravity" since it involves gravity and quantum mechanics. Of course it is not quantum gravity in the usual sense of studying Planck-scale phenomena. I think the tag is still appropriate

EDIT: Gravitional bound states of molecules will often be unstable with respect to collapse to a van der Waals bound state (thx Vladimir for bring up the issue of vad der Waals interaction in the comments). However the lifetime of these states is very long.

share|improve this question
    
Sure but I'm interested in situations which are quantum mechanical (coherent) –  Squark Nov 12 '11 at 12:50
    
AFAIR there was a paper on eigenstates of cold atoms in (external) gravitational field. They were (again, AFAIR) hold by an evanescent laser beam. –  Piotr Migdal Nov 12 '11 at 13:07
    
@Vladimir, the Shroedinger equation is practically irrelevant for astronomic bodies because of decoherence. However, we may in principle consider chunks of molecular matter at zero temperature, provided sufficient isolation. The maximal relevant size such of such is a chunk is when the "Bohr radius" equals the size of the chunk, that is (hbar^2 / G * rho^3)^1/10. Typical density at zero temperature should be proton mass per (real) Bohr radius cubed, that is 10000 kg / m^3 (close to the density of lead). This leads to 100 nm, about the size of an HIV virus. –  Squark Nov 12 '11 at 13:59
    
And what is effect of the Van de Waals interaction of such chunks? –  Vladimir Kalitvianski Nov 12 '11 at 16:17

1 Answer 1

As you correctly observed, the size of the bound states is huge and no region is empty to allow them to live. You may describe this problem in terms of temperature: the binding energy of this gravitational bound state is so tiny that any temperature above a certain ludicrously tiny (cold) threshold will ionize your "gravitational atom". 1.9 Kelvin is surely enough, by many orders of magnitude.

If you wait for gadzillions of years, one may ultimately get an empty enough Universe but there will probably be no one to observe such objects. In fact, even the thermal radiation from observers similar to us would still be enough to perturb the "gravitational atom".

You may get gravitational bound states of more sensible radii if the particles orbiting in it are heavier – e.g. stars – but then it makes no sense to describe it quantum mechanically because the objects constantly decohere because of the same CMB etc.

At any rate, it's great and creative you're thinking about such possibly overlooked concepts in ordinary physics applied to unusual forces and particles. Another exercise for you could be to figure out whether there may be bound states held together by the weak nuclear force – by the exchange of Z-bosons (or W-bosons). Are there some new bound states you may get in this way? Note that the weak force is as strong as electromagnetism but its range is short – so you may only look among bound states "similar to the electromagnetic ones" whose typical radius is however short. For example, can you make Higgs-Higgs atom-like bound states in this way?

In particular, could you explain both the 120 GeV Higgs and the 240 GeV Higgs to be observed at CERN using the same starting point?

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.