Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

At the seminar where the talk was about quasicrystals, I mentioned that some results on their properties remind the fractals. The person who gave the talk was not too fluent in a rigor mathematics behind those properties, and I was not able to find any clues to this area myself.

There are some papers where fractals are mentioned in application to quasicrystals, but I did not find any introductory level paper with careful mathematics. Probably there is such an introduction somewhere?

share|improve this question
    
I remember from somewhere that quasiperiodic potentials yield fractal energy spectra –  Squark Oct 29 '11 at 12:10
    
@Squark That's exactly what I am looking for. Not the statement itself, but some place where this fact is shown. –  Misha Oct 29 '11 at 15:00
add comment

2 Answers

Wikipedia's discussion of Penrose tiling accessibly describes two key attributes of Penrose' tiling:

  • it is aperiodic yet self-similar under scaling ("fractal")
  • it has a Fourier transform with discrete five-fold symmetry ("crystalline")

In particular, the self-similar geometry of the Penrose tiling explicitly accords with Benoit Mandelbrot's definition of fractal objects:

Mandelbrot's definition: "Fractals are irregular shapes, in either mathematics or the real world, wherein each small part is very much like a reduced-size image of the whole."

Two well-posed concrete questions then arise:

  • Does the Fourier transform of an (aperiodic) Penrose tiling show diffraction peaks similar to structures with period long-range order?
  • Starting with a single 'seed' tile and adding more tiles by strictly local matching rules, can we grow an arbitrarily large perfect Penrose tiling?

The Penrose tiling has the advantages of being simple and well posed, and moreover the preceding questions generalize naturally to real-world questions like: "By what physical process do atoms find their place in growing real-world quasi-crystals? Do local (classical) matching rules suffice to explain quasi-crystal growth at the atomic level, or are nonlocal (quantum) rules required?' Can real-world quasi-crystals grown by local classical matching rules ever be defect-free? What spatial symmetries determine the pentagonal facets that are seen on real-world quasicrystals?"

With regard to diffraction patterns, recent surveys by Peter Kramer (arXiv:1101.0061) and by Michael Baake and Uwe Grimm (arXiv:1105.0095v1) emphasize the pioneering work of Alan Mackay, whose 1982 article "Crystallography and the Penrose pattern" showed (experimentally) that Penrose tilings exhibit diffraction patterns having ten-fold symmetry; this stimulated an explosion of work that confirmed that such diffraction patterns are generic to quasicrystalline order.

Mackay's simulated diffraction pattern from a Penrose tiling

— Mackay's simulated diffraction pattern from a Penrose tiling —

With regard to quasicrystal growth, an accessible entry-point into a large literature is Uwe Grimm's and Dieter Joseph's review "Modelling Quasicrystal Growth" (arXiv:cond-mat/9903074).

A widespread opinion nowadays (one hesitates to call it a 'consensus') is that local matching rules for adding atoms, augmented by remelting processes, permit the growth of quasicrystalline structures having low (but nonzero) defect densities, sufficient to explain the observed growth of macroscopic crystals that exhibit five-fold spatial and Fourier symmetries.

millimeter-scale quasicrystal

— Ho-Mg-Zn quasicrystal (millimeter background scale) —

Contrary to early speculation, it seems that nonlocal (quantum) effects are not required to explain quasicrystal growth on macroscopic scales.

share|improve this answer
    
And what about fractality? –  Misha Oct 29 '11 at 16:02
    
@Nestoklon, the answer is now amended to quote Benoit Mandelbrot's definition of fractals, in accord with which Penrose tilings are two-dimensional fractals. –  John Sidles Oct 29 '11 at 17:25
    
Still not convinced. Mandelbrot is a nice popularizer, but there is a formal approach: one may calculate dimensionality, probably some other useful properties. Based on self-similarity of the lattice obtain self-similarity of the spectrum, whatever. That's what I am looking for. I don't know even good explanation in what sense "each small part is very much like a reduced-size image of the whole" is applicable to quasicrystals. –  Misha Oct 29 '11 at 18:24
    
@Nestoklon, I have added some references (and a picture) that illustrate how self-similarity under rescaling in Penrose tilings generates spectral peaks in diffraction patterns. Thanks for asking a great question! –  John Sidles Oct 29 '11 at 20:08
1  
@Misha: Mandelbrot is not a popularizer, but the father of the field. –  Ron Maimon May 28 '12 at 6:23
add comment
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Finally I asked the person working in this field and he gave me the paper http://prb.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v35/i3/p1020_1 where fractality of the spectrum is shown in rather reasonable model.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.