Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've seen both theoretical and observational definitions of stars. For example, an AGB star is a star where two sets of nuclear reactions (helium to carbon and hydrogen to helium) are taking place in shells around the core, and a super AGB star is one that is also burning carbon in the core.

Is there a similar theoretical distinction between red giants and red supergiants? I know RGB stars are burning hydrogen in a shell while the core is inert, so is a red supergiant a star which is also burning helium in the core (or something similar)?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

The short answer is no: there isn't a agreed theoretical distinction between red giants and red supergiants.

The source of confusion is that the red giant branch (RGB) is a theoretical concept, but the Yerkes spectral classification also defines a red giant observationally. So when astronomers talk about red giants, it isn't necessarily clear which is meant. Scientists who calculate models of stars are probably talking about stars that are burning hydrogen in a shell around a helium core, whereas scientists who actually measure starlight are probably talking about stars which meet certain criteria for colour and brightness. The spectral classification defines red supergiants, but there isn't a corresponding theoretical "red supergiant branch" like there is for the RGB.

So, unlike red giants, red supergiants are simply bright, red stars. It so happens that they may be in the same evolutionary state, but it is also possible that they have moved on. For example, most massive stars will appear as red supergiants while helium is fused into carbon in the core.

share|cite|improve this answer
In case anyone is wondering, asking and answering your own questions was encouraged here. – Warrick Jul 19 '11 at 9:21

protected by Qmechanic Jan 11 '14 at 22:58

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.