Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is the experience using the Sky-Watcher Skyhawk 1145P SynScan AZ GOTO telescope and can it be recommended for a new astronomer? Is it any good?

share|improve this question
    
It depends on what are you going to do with –  Oleg Dok Jan 12 '12 at 6:25
    
Star gazing and looking at planets etc this will be our first telescope –  Diana Brown Jan 12 '12 at 9:26
1  
Goto mount is one of those things that sounds really good on paper, until you get some experience and learn what it really means. Unless you're completely unable to read a simple map, a goto mount will more likely get in the way, rather than help. Get a dobsonian instead, it's more bang for the buck. Install Stellarium on an iPhone or laptop. Get the "Turn left at Orion" book. –  Florin Andrei Feb 29 '12 at 0:47
add comment

3 Answers

No, I would not recommend this telescope. It has several counts against it:

  1. Small aperture: 150 mm aperture is a recommended minimum.

  2. Short focal ratio: Good mainly for low power wide field views, not suitable for planets.

  3. Most of the money goes into the computer, very little into the optics.

Instead, I recommend a manual telescope with a large enough aperture to give satisfying views of both planets and deep sky objects. For the same money you can get a larger and more solidly mounted Dobsonian like Skywatcher Dobsonian Telescopes - Dobsonian Telescopes by OVL.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks all, i really like the idea of a goto mount, i realise that this is not the best scope and optics are below minium recomendations. So i have found another one that i think might do the trick. I am limited for physical space to store the telescope so i have found a small scope with a larger Focal length SKYWATCHER SKYMAX 102 MAKSUTOV-CASSEGRAIN. Magnifications (with eyepieces supplied): x52 & x130 Highest Practical Power (Potential): x204 Diameter of Primary Mirror: 102mm Telescope Focal Length: 1300mm (f/12.74) Thanks for all your responces –  Diana Brown Jan 14 '12 at 23:37
add comment

I don't have much personal experience of the cheaper goto mounts but I would be suspicious of any goto mount under £300 (thats just the mount! telescope would be extra.) I would recommend spending more on optics and solid mount rather than motorised systems for that budget.

A brief look finds this telescope of similar design but better spec, and a fairly trusty mount.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks all, i really like the idea of a goto mount, i realise that this is not the best scope and optics are below minium recomendations. So i have found another one that i think might do the trick. I am limited for physical space to store the telescope so i have found a small scope with a larger Focal length SKYWATCHER SKYMAX 102 MAKSUTOV-CASSEGRAIN. Magnifications (with eyepieces supplied): x52 & x130 Highest Practical Power (Potential): x204 Diameter of Primary Mirror: 102mm Telescope Focal Length: 1300mm (f/12.74) Thanks for all your responces –  Diana Brown Jan 14 '12 at 23:36
add comment

It is not very suitable for planets. Actually it's best for the Moon and large diffuse objects like nebulae, clusters and galaxies. It is suitable for backyard pleasure.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.