Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If for some reason, an Astrophysics graduate decides to shift to Finance will he/she be in a better position (given his/her overspecialization) to make a transition compared to his/her counterparts who've been doing Analytical/Observational Astrophysics?

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off topic by Manishearth Dec 15 '12 at 9:12

Questions on Physics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to physics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I'm sorry, but this question is off topic for Physics.SE. Please read the faq before posting :) – Manishearth Dec 15 '12 at 9:13
up vote 1 down vote accepted

I've not made the transition myself, and it certainly depends on what aspect of finance you go into, but the answer is likely "absolutely." If you were to end up doing computational finance, I assume some of the techniques are similar.

In computational astrophysics, we often simulate a physical problem by breaking it up into discrete chunks and evolving some partial differential equations in each of those chunks. This usually done in a multidimensional framework of up to ~7 (3 space + 3 momentum + time) dimensions if you are doing radiation hydrodynamics solving the Boltzmann transport equation.

I'm a bit unfamiliar with computational finance, but I imagine you have a similar problem in that you have some differential equations telling you how each of the important variables changes with respect to your dependent variables. The problem here is likely to be similar to wanting to minimize some "energy" (read: maximize some profit) function in some very high-dimensional phase space - certainly greater than 7.

Nevertheless, their certainly exists an overlap in techniques. More importantly, the ability to think about and solve problems in the discrete manner used in computational astrophysics will certainly be applicable in areas outside of astronomy, such as finance.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.