Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Due to light travel time, we observe astronomical objects as they were in the past. If we knew objects' motion (relative to us), it seems like we could extrapolate to their present positions, but I can't remember ever reading about anything like this. Has there been any work like this done--or is there some reason why it would be pointless?

share|cite|improve this question
This is actually something I wondered during my undergrad astronomy classes but I never asked. I think part of the answer is that it's not worth doing in general because of the computation required (e.g., to do so with individual stars in a galaxy, galaxies in a cluster, etc.) and also because gravity also travels at the speed of light so the objects are affecting us from their current seen locations rather from where they "really" are today. But this is a guess on my part which is why I'm posting it as a comment and not as a full response. – Stuart Robbins Jul 15 '11 at 19:57

The geometry of space-time is a major issue in cosmology, but the focus is on cosmic time-scales, the data (necessarily) are from the past, and physicists can sometimes get a little testy if you push them to use the word "now" in reference to distant things. But in casual conversation, you can say that the Andromeda Galaxy is "right now" closer to us than it appears (or vice versa for most other galaxies).

But as @Stuart Robbins said in his comment, no information can move faster than the speed of light, so scientific predictions outside the light cone are unlikely to have a practical benefit. (I hesitate to say "pointless" because I'm not a physicist or cosmologist.)

share|cite|improve this answer
I may be just a grad student, but as an astrophysicist I fully back the statement that such predictions will not have a practical benefit. Even if you worked to develop a well-defined notion of "now" (possible thanks to the CMB, but not possible in pure SR), information outside your light cone is in some sense outside your universe, and making statements about it is bad practice at best. – Chris White Jan 26 '13 at 2:42

Very interesting and thought provoking question. Unfortunately we are not in the era of "Enterprise" to care that much about the current placement of cosmic bodies further than our Solar System. For the bodies in our Solar System we do map objects' current or predicted locations for various reasons as you are aware of.

share|cite|improve this answer

To know where an object is 'now', you need to know its space velocity as well as its distance so that you can calculate its present three-dimensional position from the position that you measure from its light. For most stars, it's easiest to get the radial velocity since that just needs a spectrum. To get the velocity perpendicular to the line of sight, you need both its distance and apparent motion in the sky. For distant galaxies, one can't normally determine space velocity at all since the measured redshift is made up of both distance and space velocity effects; and, even if they are moving very fast perpendicular to the line of sight, it will take thousands of years to see this motion on the sky.

So, in short, it's a lot of trouble for very little gain.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.