Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

As a dark matter candidate, what should be the temperature and kinetic energy (or also the speed) of the WIMPs (weakly interacting massive particles) to agree with the observed distribution of dark matter and not to accumulate so much in the inner part (40 AU radius) of the Solar System that the change in the orbits of the planets would be observable? Is it in equilibrium with the microwave background radiation or not yet or never will?

EDIT: I have replaced some part into another question, Evidence of dark matter in our galaxy, and I have deleted some other part.

share|cite|improve this question
The sub-parts of this question are not very strongly related. Please consider cutting all but one part from this question and pasting them into separate questions. You will get answers more focused on the content in which you are most interested. – Andrew Jul 8 '11 at 14:42
up vote 4 down vote accepted

In a classic two-body situation, the WIMPs can't accumulate in the solar system no matter how slowly they are travelling; they will leave the solar system at the same speed at which they entered the solar system. Add a passing star or interstellar cloud, and it's possible that a few slow WIMPS would get captured; and interactions with the planets, principally Jupiter, could also capture a few. But once captured, they would be subject to being thrown out of the solar system by the same mechanisms, so I would guess that the total mass of WIMPs captured by the solar system in an equilibrium situation would be rather low. See:

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.