Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Are telescopes with a concave lens (instead of convex ones) ever useful for astronomy?

And if so, where are they used? Do they ever affect resolving power?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 8 down vote accepted

If you only have concave lenses, you won't be able to focus. If you remember your elementary optics, a concave lense has a negative focal length.

They can be utilized as part of a series of lenses. A concave eyepiece can avoid image inversion, which many people find irritating. A concave lense mounted just inside of a normal eyepiece can be used to increase magnification. These are called Barlow lenses.

share|cite|improve this answer

Divergent lenses or mirrors are used in telescopes all the time, just not alone. They are combined with convergent elements in order to fix some subtle issues of the convergent optics.

The achromatic refractor objective is a pair of lenses, one convergent, the other divergent.

The Cassegrain reflector telescope is made, again, with a convergent mirror and then a divergent smaller mirror.

Most eyepiece (ocular) designs these days include several lenses, usually between 4 and 7, sometimes more, and some of those are divergent.

share|cite|improve this answer
If I'm not mistaken, the large number of lenses is what makes them expensive. – Warrick Aug 18 '11 at 8:54
@Warrick The expense in telescopes comes from the quality and size of lenses and mirrors. Larger diameter components are difficult to make with high quality. Aspherical components (e.g., parabolic) are also more expensive, as are lenses with achromatic glass. – Bill N Mar 9 '15 at 18:14

A concave lens doesn't bring light to a focus, so is of no use as the objective lens of a telescope. Concave lenses were used as eyepieces by Galileo. Their main drawback is that give an extremely narrow field of view. They were soon replaced by Kepler's version: a simple double convex lens, and that was soon replaced by Huyghens' double lens design, still found today on cheap telescopes.

share|cite|improve this answer

A Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope has a concave front surface to the objective lens. This is, however, as part of a meniscus lens (the lens is part of a hollow sphere).

This helps with aberrations introduced by a spherical primary mirror.

share|cite|improve this answer

protected by Qmechanic Mar 9 '15 at 16:27

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.