Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

From the Apollo missions we know that the moon is covered with dust. Where does it come from? Is it from the erosion of the moon rock? By what? Or by accretion of dust from space? Which comes from where?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 12 down vote accepted

As Ravachol quoted, the material on the surface of the moon is mainly the result of billions of years of micrometeorite impacts onto larger rocks on the lunar surface. We call this material "regolith" as opposed to "soil" because the latter term is used in geology to indicate a more biological/organic origin. "Regolith" should technically be used to describe the surface material on all surfaces except Earth, but even planetary scientists will slip from time-to-time.

The process of creating regolith is usually referred to as "gardening" because the surface material is hit by extraplanetary/lunar material, it will be broken up and tend to move a little, and then the material underneath it can be hit. This in general creates a process of slow overturn where the upper several meters will be broken up regolith before you hit more competent rock. However, the depth of the regolith can change significantly over the surface of the moon.

It's also not just created by the micrometeorite impacts, but also larger impacts. A 1-km-diameter crater will produce a layer of ejecta that, after about 1 billion years, will become generally indistinguishable from the surrounding regolith except for maybe a slight topographic difference (ramp as you approach the crater rim). These larger impacts are rarer, but they do create significantly more future regolith material than the micrometeorite bombardment in one go.

And yes, to a lesser extent, cosmic rays and solar wind will help generate regolith, but they are very minor compared with actual meteoritic material. Also, you can have tidal forces and some seismic activity (mostly from tidal forces) that will add to this, but those are also very minor.

share|cite|improve this answer
In short: 4.5 billion years without dusting, and even the Apollo astronauts were not equipped with feather dusters. – Georg Nov 15 '11 at 16:51

From wikipedia : The physical properties of lunar soil are primarily the result of mechanical disintegration of basaltic and anorthositic rock, caused by continuous meteoric impact and bombardment by interstellar charged atomic particles over billions of years. The process is largely one of mechanical erosion in which the particles are ground to finer and finer size over time.

share|cite|improve this answer
The process is called sputtering. – Andrew Nov 9 '11 at 18:30
""The process is called sputtering. "" Wrong! Sputtering is the disintegration of atoms or clusters of some atoms from a cathode in a glow discharge. Sputtering does not produce dust, the particles collect on a target as a mirror or, in the case of the moon they would vanish in space. – Georg Nov 16 '11 at 17:55

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.