Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question already has an answer here:

If I say that the universe is finite, how can you say with certain that I am wrong?

share|cite|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Qmechanic Sep 23 '13 at 13:12

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

First you have to define "universe" – TryTryAgain Mar 29 '12 at 22:42
Resisting the temptation to post a variant of this answer. – Keith Thompson Apr 2 '12 at 2:13
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Due to General Relativity the universe started 13.7GYr ago. It was finite then and since there was no phase of infinite expansion, it is still finite.

share|cite|improve this answer
Where is your proof that it was finite then? Current measurements of the curvature of space indicate that it's flat; and a flat universe has to be infinite. – Dan Neely Mar 21 '12 at 13:48
@DanNeely Was it flat back then too? – draks ... Mar 21 '12 at 14:14
@DanNeely Indications are not proof. – delete this account Feb 20 '14 at 16:49
@deletethisaccount A model is not a proof either... – anderstood Oct 21 '15 at 21:09

George Gamow tried to explain the origin of the Elements Georges Lemaître's theory of the expansion of the Universe. He proposed a ball of neutrons exploding as the Big Bang,nucleocosmogenesis. Alpher and Robert Herman predicted that the afterglow of the big bang would have cooled down after billions of years, filling the universe with a radiation 5 degrees above absolute zero. Alpher and Herman's prediction in support of the big bang was not substantiated until 1964, when Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson made the accidental discovery, for which they were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1978.The universe was once very hot and dense, and the photons and baryons formed a plasma. As the universe expanded and cooled, the radiation (photons) decoupled from the matter. The radiation cooled and is now at 2.73 Kelvin.

share|cite|improve this answer
This is amazing conformation of the Big Bang & the finite nature of time & space. – Brian Goulet Mar 29 '12 at 18:06

If the universe is infinite, there would be an infinite amount of stars in it, therefore there will be no night and we have to sleep in Sunglasses.

share|cite|improve this answer
not necessarily. the universe could be a fractal.'_paradox – Jus12 Apr 2 '12 at 13:35
What you're describing is Olber's paradox. It requires the universe to be infinite in both volume and prior duration. A finite volume or a finite age will both render it null and void. – Dan Neely Apr 2 '12 at 17:35
This reminds me of Aristotle's proof that vacuum does not exist... (otherwise moving my hand would give it an infinite velocity...) – anderstood Oct 21 '15 at 21:11

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.