Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A spiral arm orbiting a central mass should be dispersed quite quickly as the outer elements would move more slowly than the inner ones. The Milky Way, is about 59 Galactic Years old, which, one would have thought, would be enough rotations to disperse a spiral structure entirely.

Is there, then, something keeping the spiral arms in existence, and if so what could it be? Or are the spiral galaxies monstrous co-incidences?

share|improve this question
According to wikipedia, the galaxy is about 59 galactic years old. –  seanmonstar Jun 8 '11 at 21:42
@seanmonstar I always though GY meant giga-year, or 1 billion years. –  Carson Myers Jul 12 '11 at 6:08
@seanmonstar, you are quite right; I've edited accordingly. Thank you. –  Brian Hooper Jul 12 '11 at 7:29

3 Answers 3

up vote 22 down vote accepted

The material (gas and stars) in the outer part of a galaxy move with roughly the same velocity as the inner part (for example, see this paper), which means that the inner portions do indeed have a faster angular speed; this is sometimes referred to as the "winding problem."

One important feature of spiral arms is that they are bright more because they have lots of young stars than because they have extra material. Young populations of stars include bright, short-lived, blue stars, which die off over time, leaving the fainter, redder populations. Populations of these young stars are particularly apparent in images like this one. Because of this population of bright, young stars, the density of matter in spiral arms compared to the non-arm disk is not as great as their brightness would suggest.

The usual explanation for spiral arms is that they are the result of density waves rather than moving structures. See this paper for a short review.

share|improve this answer

Because of "Dark Matter", and it's everywhere! Astronomers have found that supermassive black holes could live in the heart of galaxies and pull stars at incredible speeds, but it's not strong enough to hold all the stars in the gigantic galaxies together.

So, to your question of what does hold them together:

A Swiss astronomer named Fritz Zwicky wondered why galaxies stay together in groups; he concluded that there must be something going undetected and coined it to be "Dark Matter." To prove it scientists would build virtual galaxies using computers, simulating stars, gravity and so forth - astronomers were looking forward to such experiments yielding the integrated galaxy similar to our own. But, what they found was disintegration!

The gravity of the galaxy is not enough to hold it together, so scientists added virtual gravity from virtual dark matter to the simulation experiment, and it solved the problem: gravity from dark matter held galaxies together. So, we can say that "Dark Matter is The "Master Of The Universe".

share|improve this answer
Thanks for your input; I have formatted your post to make it a little more clear, but I think it could still do with some linked references to help solidify your point and provide the community with some further reading. –  Grant Thomas Jul 8 '11 at 19:48
-1; This answer does not answer the original question. The question is how spiral arms can exist, not what holds the galaxy bound. –  Thriveth Jun 9 '13 at 12:51

Galaxies stay together because gravity is about A BILLION TIMES faster than the speed of light.*

*This is pure heresy to Einsteinians of course (disciples of Einsteins general and special relativity theories), since they firmly believe that nothing travels faster than light. Not even gravity. If this were true however,it would make galaxies like Hercules A (1.5 million light years in diameter), an astro-physical impossibility , an illusion, a CGI effect. It would make black holes gravitationally moot (nothing could escape a black hole, not even gravity at a puny velocity of 300 000km/s) and the solar system would have disintegrated eons ago due to something called the Poynting–Robertson effect. Go figure.

share|improve this answer
Source of this claim? –  jinawee Jun 28 at 9:24
I think it is by now wildly accepted in the scientific world that gravity does travel at the speed of light. I'm not a cosmologist myself, but to my knowledge, the existence black holes is compatible with that. Lately, gravitational waves observed which are consistent with the speed of light being the speed of gravity. Please note that we pursue mainstream-physics on this site. If you refer to some exotic theory, you should at least give a reference (e.g. a journal article). –  Jonas Jun 28 at 10:00
I don't buy it because gravity is a force and can't really be compared to a speed. –  Kyle Kanos Jun 28 at 15:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.