Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am reading Nielsen and Chuang on P. 291, for anyone interested in the origin of my question.

Given an annihilator a and its corresponding creator a_adj such that [a,a_adj] = 1 and another annihilator b with creator b_adj, I see that the argument in a proof claims the following:

Let G = a_adj*b - a*b_adj. Then, [G,a ] = -b and [G,b] = a.

I don't see how these two relations hold. Can someone please point me in the right direction or prove them?

Thank you SOCommunity!

share|improve this question
1  
Hi, just use $[XY,Z]=XYZ-ZXY = XYZ-XZY+XZY-ZXY = X[Y,Z]+[X,Z]Y$ and the basic commutators $[a,a^\dagger]=1$ and similarly for $b$ while other commutators vanish. You will see that from the right hand side, only one term survives and it gives you what you need. –  Luboš Motl Apr 18 '12 at 16:48
    
It works! Thank you! –  Abe Asfaw Apr 18 '12 at 16:53
    
This question is not research-level. It should be migrated to physics.se –  Frédéric Grosshans Apr 20 '12 at 8:59
add comment

migrated from theoreticalphysics.stackexchange.com Apr 20 '12 at 13:19

This question came from our site for scientific theorists and academic scholars interested in theoretical, research-level physics.

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.