Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A cockroach is crawling along the walls inside a cubical room that has an edge length of 3 m. If the cockroach starts from the back lower left hand corner of the cube and finishes at the front upper right hand corner, what is the magnitude of the displacement of the cockroach?

Simple question, but I don't understand the answer they provide. In my mind the cockroach has a displacement of 3m. Can someone verify or point my intuition in the right direction.

share|improve this question

4 Answers 4

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Displacemtns are vector quantities which are determined on the basis of the final and initial position of the object. WHen you have a cube

enter image description here

Let's say the insect traveled form one of the blue balls to another blue ball. Let's represent each of them by vectors from a reference origin $O$. Then the initial position vector $r_0$ and final position vector $r_1$.

Hence your displacements would be $r_1 - r_0$. which in magnitude will be $|r_1-r_0|$ i.e. the distance between the two blue balls.

One can use Pythagoras theorem to get the desired displacement in magnitude and direction of the vector would be from initial positron to final position.

share|improve this answer
    
the cockroach has to go along the walls, unless it's one of those Indian flying cockroaches, or a pregnant female, which I don't think was the intended meaning. –  Ron Maimon Apr 15 '12 at 6:25
    
Sorry, question asked for displacement. –  Ron Maimon Apr 15 '12 at 6:44
    
@RonMaimon: duh..it's the american ones which fly...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/….. :P :P –  Vineet Menon Apr 15 '12 at 12:23

Remember that the displacement is the the vector that goes from the starting point to the finishing point. In your case, it is the diagonal that bonds the back lower left corner and the front upper right corner.

share|improve this answer
    
Except the cockroach can't fly. –  Ron Maimon Apr 15 '12 at 6:25
    
@Ron-Maimon It has nothing to do with it's ability to fly. The displacement IS DEFINED in that way. Maybe you are thinking in DISTANCE which a totally different measure in physics. Read more here: physicsclassroom.com/class/1dkin/u1l1c.cfm –  Néstor Apr 15 '12 at 6:29
    
@RonMaimon, I see from your answer that you actually confused distance with displacement, which was what the OP asked for :P. –  Néstor Apr 15 '12 at 6:36
    
Yes, I misinterpreted it as distance. My bad. No need for refs, you are right. –  Ron Maimon Apr 15 '12 at 6:43

The cockroach first crawls along the floor to the halfway point of one of the two edges of the floor which are not attached to the starting point. This initial distance is

$$ S_1 = \sqrt{3^2+(1.5)^2} = {3\sqrt{5}\over 2} $$

Then the cockroach crawls up the wall to the corner, from the midpoint of the edge to the endpoint. This distance is equal to the initial distance.

So the total distance travelled is $3\sqrt{5}$. To prove that this is the minimum distance path along the crawling surface, fold out the two crawling walls, and draw the straight line between the initial and final points--- this reproduces the path above.

EDIT: except the question asked for displacement, not distance, and this is a trivial application of the pythagorean theorem, and the answer is $3\sqrt{3}$.

share|improve this answer
    
I call it the "trithagorean theorem", but that's just me :) –  Manishearth Apr 15 '12 at 8:24
    
I am very appreciative of the quick response, but I am still not seeing the whole picture. Using Pythagoras theorem, it appears as though the displacement will be 3 + 3√2. The diagonal resultant distance between two corners + the distance from the bottom of that corner to the top right. @Ron - I am not clear on where the value 1.5 comes into the distance calculation, perhaps this is where I am missing the full picture. –  Kurt Apr 15 '12 at 19:10
    
Ok, I am clear on arriving at 3√5/2. When the two panels of the cube are folded out we have a base length of 6m and a height of 3m. Then D^2 = 3^2 + 6^2, which leaves us with 3√5. Do we divide by 2 because the displacement is equal to the area under the line, which creates a triangle? Leaving me with 3√5/2, the total distance travelled, but the question is asking for displacement. However, I don't see movement in any negative vector quantity that would change the displacement, in this case, from varying to the distance travelled. –  Kurt Apr 15 '12 at 19:27
    
@Kurt: Yes--- the issue with the divided by 2 is that each half-path on the individual face is this big--- the total distance travelled is $3\sqrt{5}$ as you say. The addition of displacements is vectorial, component by component, and the two individual displacements are perpendicular. I left this answer up, even though the original interpretation was totally wrong, because I imagined you were confused the same way I was. It's a trick question, and the only way to get it wrong is to misinterpret it as asking something nontrivial. I don't like these kinds of questions. They penalize thinking. –  Ron Maimon Apr 15 '12 at 20:06

The cube is three dimensional so you could use the Pythagorean theorem for many dimensions $c^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 $. Here $x$, $y$ and $z$ are the distances traveled in each of the directions, and $c$ is the shortest distance, which is diagonally from corner to corner (also the displacement).

$x = y = z = 3 $

$c = \sqrt ( 3^2 + 3^2 + 3^2 )$

$c = \sqrt 27 $

$c = 3 \sqrt 3 $

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.