# Why are alpha particles made of 2 protons and neutrons?

When experiencing alpha decay, atoms shed alpha particles made of 2 protons and 2 neutrons. Why can't we have other types of particles made of more or less protons?

-
You can have other bits. Google "fission fragments" or "fissile fragments". If I find time maybe I'll write a real answer that talks about energy, stability, and phase space. If I get really ambitious I might say something about long range correlations in the nucleus. – dmckee Apr 11 '12 at 22:12
@dmckee: But you don't have "Be" decay where a Be flies out of a nucleus. You have alpha decay. – Ron Maimon Apr 12 '12 at 2:05
– voix Apr 12 '12 at 4:55

The reason why alpha particles heavily dominate as the proton-neutron mix most likely to be emitted from most (not all!) radioactive components is the extreme stability of this particular combination. That same stability is also why helium dominates after hydrogen as the most common element in the universe, and why other higher elements had to be forged in the hearts and shells of supernovas in order to come into existence at all.

Here's one way to think of it: You could in principle pop off something like helium-3 from an unstable nucleus - that's two protons and one neutron - and very likely give a net reduction in nuclear stress. But what would happen is this: The moment the trio started to depart, a neutron would come screaming in saying look how much better it would be if I joined you!! And the neutron would be correct: The total reduction in energy obtained by forming a helium-4 nucleus instead of helium-3 would in almost any instance be so superior that any self-respecting (and energy-respecting) nucleus would just have to go along with the idea.

Now all of what I just said can (and in the right circumstances should) be said far more precisely in terms of issues such as tunneling probabilities, but it would not really change the message much: Helium-4 nuclei pop off preferentially because they are so hugely stable that it just makes sense from a stability viewpoint for them to do so.

The next most likely candidates are isolated neutrons and protons, incidentally. Other mixed versions are rare until you get up into the fission range, in which case the whole nucleus is so unstable that it can rip apart in very creative ways (as aptly noted by the earlier comment).

-
This is a good and accurate explanation, I don't know why you think it needs a lot more precision, but I think one should add that the extreme stability is due to the two spin states (up down) and two isospin states (p n) of the nucleon. This means that you can put exactly for nucleons at the same point without using higher orbits--- two protons of opposite spins and two neutrons of opposite spins, and this is the alpha particle. – Ron Maimon Apr 12 '12 at 2:07
Good point and well worth mentioning, thanks! – Terry Bollinger Apr 13 '12 at 19:10

$\alpha$ particles are really $He^4_2$ nucleus i.e made up of 2 neutron and 2 protons.

As you can see in this graph, $He^4_2$ ion has a high binding energy per nucleon, i.e. it is highly stable among all the neighboring nuclei. This makes them easy to sustain their existence and makes it easier for the nuclei to emit them in radioactive decay thus making the resultant nuclei much more stable than if a $He_2^3$ would have escaped.

-
Why not say it's an isospin and spin singlet? This is the reason for the abnormal stability, and the sudden drop at Li6. – Ron Maimon Apr 12 '12 at 7:17
Because "isospin" and "spin singlet" requires a good bit of background knowledge. This graph gets the point across much more effectively. – P O'Conbhui Apr 12 '12 at 16:20