Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can it only be done in Euclidean space? Doesn't Euclidean space only model extrinsic curvature?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

No, Euclidian space is not necessary. You can "model" intrinsic curvature using the beautiful language of Riemannian geometry, whose great triumph was formulating a vocabulary that lets you talk about the curvature of a space without making reference to an extrinsic space in which the curved space is embedded: hence the term intrinsic.

This is crucial to general relativity, since embedding a curved 4-space in flat Euclidean space requires that the Euclidean space be ten-dimensional, and dealing with that embedding would suck.

share|cite|improve this answer

I'm not quite sure what you mean by the term "model" in this context, but:

If a space is a Euclidean space, in the sense that it has a Euclidean metric, then its Levi Civita connection (the connection compatible with its metric) has no intrinsic curvature (for example a flat plane is like this). However, it may be given some extrinsic curvature by means of an embedding into a higher dimensional space (the flat plane may be rolled up into a cylinder in $\mathbb{R}^3$).

But if you were a two dimensional organism living on the cylinder, you couldn't detect this extrinsic curvature by locally measuring angles and distances.

share|cite|improve this answer
Very clear. How can one relate both metrics? – stringparser Apr 11 '12 at 13:27

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.