Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

From the divergence theorem for any vector field E,

$\displaystyle\oint E\cdot da=\int (\nabla\cdot E) ~d\tau$

and from Gauss's law

$\displaystyle\oint E\cdot da=\frac{Q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_0}=\int \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}~d\tau$


$\displaystyle\int\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}d\tau=\int (\nabla\cdot E)~d\tau$

Textbooks conclude from the last equation that

$\displaystyle \nabla\cdot E=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}$

My question is how can we conclude that the integrands are the same? Because I can think of the following counter example, assume

$\displaystyle \int_{-a}^a f(x)~dx=\displaystyle \int_{-a}^a [f(x)+g(x)]~dx$

where $g(x)$ is an odd function. Obviously the 2 integrals are equal but we cannot conclude that $f(x)$ is equal to $f(x)+g(x)$ so where is the flaw?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

The equation $$\displaystyle\int_{V}\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}d\tau=\int_{V}(\nabla\cdot E)~d\tau$$ is true for all region $V$ in space the integration is performed over. That is why it follows that the integrands are equal. Your counterexample is invalid, because the integrals are equal only when the domain of integration is of the form $[-a,a]$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.