Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm trying to understand the empty universe model. My first textbook (which doesn't cover the empty universe) gives the Friedmann equation as

$$\left[\frac{1}{R}\frac{dR}{dt}\right]^{2}=\frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho-\frac{kc^{2}}{R^{2}}$$ Am I right in thinking all I need do is put $\rho=0$ so $$\frac{dR}{dt}=\pm c$$

for $k=-1$ and then say $$R=\pm ct$$ for an expanding or contracting empty universe?

Does that also mean an empty universe is expanding or contracting at the speed of light?

Many thanks (apologies if this is blindingly obvious)

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The curvature radius is increasing at a rate of the speed of light. To see how fast a comoving observer is receding from you (assuming you are a comoving observer as well), you need the Hubble parameter and the observer's distance.

$$ v=H\cdot d $$

$$ H = \dot R/R $$

You can see that everything past the Hubble radius $d_H = c/H$ recedes faster than the speed of light, independent of the content of the Universe. Why don't you read up on it, there is an excellent paper by Davis and Lineweaver about common misconceptions.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for that. I looked at the paper - superluminal galaxies are not travelling faster than light in our or any other observer's inertial frame so don't contradict STR. That is amazing. – Peter4075 Apr 3 '12 at 18:34

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.