All else being equal, is an optimal series of ideal springs stronger and more reliable then a single optimal and ideal spring of equal length?
closed as not constructive by David Zaslavsky♦ Mar 30 '12 at 9:43
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, see the FAQ for guidance.
An ideal spring is characterized by its constant in Hooke's Law, $k$. When you start putting them in combination, the resultant system behaves as a spring with a different constant, I'll call $k'$. The combinatory laws and justifications for them can be established easily.
The principle of an ideal spring is that when its end is displaced by change in position $\Delta x$ the force from the spring changes by $\Delta F = -k \Delta x$. If you attach one spring onto the end of another one, then for every $\Delta x$ the end of the spring system moves, each spring expands or contracts correspondingly by $\Delta x /2$. Then, since they are connected in series, the force maintained by both springs as well as the spring system are all equal.
Thus the new spring constant of the attached springs is $k'=k/n$ where $n$ is the number of springs connected.
Here, all springs are perturbed by the same $\Delta x$ and the forces from all of the individual spring add to produce the force of the spring system. Thus, the new spring constant of the system will be $k'=n k$.
Thus, it would be better to have your ideal springs strung together in series if you desired a lower spring constant. There is also the fact that real springs will break at some terminal value of $\Delta x$ and this will be increased in the case that they are strung together, but the breaking force would be the same. Nonetheless, these are not real springs, they are ideal springs, so the only difference is that the spring constant is decreased according to the above equation and argument.