2
$\begingroup$

I'm a bit confused about Noether's theorem (or about calculus of variations in general) when it comes to the translational symmetry $x^\mu\mapsto {x'}^\mu=x^\mu-a^\mu$. My professor just wrote that if the Lagrangian density depends on $\phi$ and $\partial_\mu\phi$ only, then it transforms like

$$ \tag{1}\mathcal L\mapsto\mathcal L'=\mathcal L+a^\mu\partial_\mu\mathcal L=\mathcal L+a^\mu\partial_\nu({\delta^\nu}_\mu\mathcal L) $$

I don't understand why this is the case and how it is derived.

This is what I have tried so far to derive it:

Let's make the "infinitesimal" translation $x^\mu\mapsto x^\mu-a^\mu$ a bit more concrete by introducing a parameter $\alpha$ that is meant in the limit $\alpha\to 0$. The translation is then $x^\mu\mapsto x^\mu-\alpha\,a^\mu$, so we have

\begin{align} \frac{d\phi}{d\alpha}=\frac{\partial\phi}{\partial {x'}^\mu}\frac{\partial{x'}^\mu}{\partial\alpha} = -a^\mu\partial_\mu\phi \end{align}

For $\mathcal L$, I got:

\begin{align} \frac{d\mathcal L}{d\alpha} & =\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial\phi}\frac{\partial\phi}{\partial\alpha} + \frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\nu\phi)}\frac{\partial(\partial_\nu\phi)}{\partial\alpha} \\ & = \frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial\phi}\frac{\partial\phi}{\partial\alpha} + \frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\nu\phi)}\partial_\nu\frac{\partial\phi}{\partial\alpha} \\ & = -a^\mu\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial\phi}\partial_\mu\phi+\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\nu\phi)}\partial_\nu\partial_\mu\phi\right)\\ & = -a^\mu\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial\phi}\partial_\mu\phi+\partial_\nu\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\nu\phi)}\partial_\mu\phi\right)-\left(\partial_\nu\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\nu\phi)}\right)\partial_\mu\phi\right)\\ & = -a^\mu\left(\partial_\nu\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\nu\phi)}\partial_\mu\phi\right)+\underbrace{\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial\phi}-\partial_\nu\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\nu\phi)}\right)}_{=0}\partial_\mu\phi\right)\\ & = -a^\mu\partial_\nu\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\nu\phi)}\partial_\mu\phi\right) \end{align}

The last term in the brackets is something else than the last term in the brackets in $(1)$. It looks more like the first part of the Noether current $j^\mu=\frac{\partial\mathcal L}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi)}\Delta\phi-\mathcal J^\mu$. However, it should be the second part, the $\mathcal J^\mu$, which is defined as the variation of $\mathcal L$ under the symmetry: $\mathcal L\mapsto\mathcal L+\epsilon\partial_\mu\mathcal J^\mu$.

What's the problem here?

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This question (v1) is essentially a field theoretic version of this Phys.SE question for point mechanics. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Dec 21, 2015 at 16:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The Lagrangian $\mathcal{L}$ can be viewed as a function of $x$ as $\mathcal{L}_{\phi}(x)=\mathcal{L}(\phi(x),(\partial_{\mu}\phi)(x))$ for a given field $\phi$. $\endgroup$
    – Dominik
    Dec 21, 2015 at 17:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Try this. I recomend understanding really really good this aspect since most of modern physics is based on QFT. $\endgroup$
    – Nikey Mike
    Dec 21, 2015 at 17:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @bass its just a Taylor expansion... $\endgroup$ Dec 21, 2015 at 20:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ $\mathcal{L}_{\phi}(x+\alpha a)=\mathcal{L}_{\phi}(x)+\alpha a^{\mu}(\partial_{\mu}\mathcal{L}_{\phi})(x)+\mathcal{O}(\alpha^{2})$. $\endgroup$
    – Dominik
    Dec 21, 2015 at 20:07

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.