Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Consider a mass 'm' suspended in the gravitational field of a massive star. Assuming the Schwarzschild metric it is easy to calculate the gravitational acceleration at the location of the mass and thus the tension in the cable. The question is: how does this tension propagate up the cable?

I've tried to apply the stress-energy tensor, but I'm not convinced I know the correct principles to apply. In thinking about this I've come up with a thought experiment that gives a surprising result and would like some comments on it, and also ideas about the "correct" way to do this via the stress-energy tensor. My thought experiment:

-Consider a long loop of cable with pulleys at each end, one directly above the other. A generator is attached to the upper pulley, and the generator is operated to provide constant tension on the cable on one side of the pulley. An operator at the bottom pulley turns a crank and makes the pulley turn one full turn and stops.

-The work done by the lower operator is $2 \pi RT$. If we assume the tension is constant up the cable (i.e. the cable is massless and there is no transform of the tension by the metric) then the work received at the generator is the same.

-If we now convert this work into a photon and send it back down to the lower pulley, when it arrives there it will be blue shifted and have additional energy, proportional to the square root of the ratio of the $g_{00}$ components of the metric. This would violate conservation of energy and allow a perpetual motion machine, so we assume that this can't happen.

-My conclusion is that the tension on the cable must vary with the square root of the time metric component. I have not seen this described anywhere, however. Does someone know the correct answer, or see the fallacy in this thought experiment?

share|cite|improve this question
As someone who doesn't fully have the GR background to understand your question, I don't understand your proposed setup that violates conservation of energy. If a photon blueshifts going from higher pulley to the lower pulley that's not a problem, it'll redshift when it goes the other way, so what's the problem? Tension equates to force, and since we have time dilation I have no expectation for force to be constant along the rope. Maybe we're in agreement on that and you're really just looking for the equation for force as a function of height, which is a valid request. – Alan Rominger Mar 13 '12 at 0:20
@AlanSE he's sending work down via the pulley. This work is converted into a photon and sent back up. The guy up top receives a photon with additional energy. But, the system hasn't changed. There's no redshift as he isn't sending a photon down. He's transmitting energy down via a rope, and up via a photon. – Manishearth Mar 13 '12 at 3:41
IMO its time dilation here. Then again, tension in a rope does vary in a g field. Im not experienced in GR so I can't calculate it. – Manishearth Mar 13 '12 at 3:42

Your naïve interpretation of the work equation doesn't quite make sense in this context. Consider that the standard formula for work gives that $W=\int {\vec F}\cdot d{\vec x}$. At minimum, the presence of the dot product in the above equation should not be ignored, and we should interpret, for a radial force, the work to be equal to $\int \frac{F\,dr}{\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r}}}^{1}$. We should then note that this factor will exactly cancel the effect you cite.

${}^{1}$Note that, properly, we are defining the line integral in terms of three unit vectors normal to the line, so, the integral would have the form $\int \sqrt{|g|}\epsilon_{abcd}{\hat t^{a}}{\hat \theta^{b}}{\hat \phi^{c}}F^{d}$. When this is completely simplified, you'll find that the measure of the integral $\sqrt{|g|}$ has a factor of $\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r}}$ that cancels against the factor of $\frac{1}{1-\frac{2M}{r}}$ in $g_{rr}$, producing the term seen above.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your question relates somewhat to space elevator science and technology.

For rods and ropes in a gravitational field you may also find useful to read ch. 5 and problems 5.5, 5.6, 5.7 of Problem book in relativity and gravitation by Lightman et al.

share|cite|improve this answer

It's very simple: When the crank operator is lowered down, his muscle strength decreases. When the cable is lowered down, its tensile strength decreases.

here is a derivation of that result

share|cite|improve this answer
This makes no sense in the context of the problem.. Have you read it properly? – Manishearth Mar 13 '12 at 6:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.