Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am getting some confusion on whether M-theory accepts many-worlds interpretation. Can anyone show me the reasons or rebuttals for the possibility of the many-worlds interpretation in M-theory? Thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
@Dilaton See one use of the many-worlds interpretation. I'd say it's pretty useful when you want to get a feel of things. – Manishearth Mar 11 '12 at 15:53
@Manishearth Yeah I`ve seen the discussion between You and @DavidZaslavsky, but I dont see how the calculations using the classical Maxwell equations can strenghten the case for the MWI and how a proper inclusion of QED should finally differ from the summation over both (or integration over all) paths. I may be wrong of course ... :-) – Dilaton Mar 17 '12 at 13:23
@Dilaton Yeah, I mean that as a standalone theory it may be pretty useless, but since it doesn't have any serious flaws, we can use it to get a feel of things in conjunction with the main theory. Which makes it useful I suppose. – Manishearth Mar 17 '12 at 13:28
@Manyshearth Even though I think the MWI is not needed for doing correct calculations in QM, it is probably ok if it helps people getting a feeling for things. – Dilaton Mar 17 '12 at 13:39
@Dilaton: While it's not any different quantum mechanics, consistientt histories is still usefu,l, e.g. in scattering amlitudes. – centralcharge Sep 1 '13 at 4:32

This contains no new information but since nobody else seems to jump in I thought I could transform my comment into a short answer.

Many-worlds is just an (dont know how useful ...) interpretation of QM and is not (directly) related to M-theory or to the large number of vacua it has as solutions. These are two separate issues or concepts which are sometimes confusingly both called multiverse. So M-theory does neither refute nor accept the many-worlds interpretation.

share|cite|improve this answer
Sorry for bumping up the question on the active question list but I assume there is no way to "quietly" add an answer ...? – Dilaton Mar 17 '12 at 13:15
Nope. When mooching around the review section the inability to make ninja edits bugs me, since I can't make more than four edits in good conscience (it clutters up the main page) – Manishearth Mar 17 '12 at 13:26
@Manyshearth I the edits are good and worth it, maybe You dont need to have a too bad concience ;-) – Dilaton Mar 17 '12 at 13:35
well, good new posts on the main page get pushed down and neglected. So even if the edits are worth it, the impact on newer questions is pretty bad.. :/ – Manishearth Mar 17 '12 at 13:37

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.