Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Some higgsless unified models of particle physics predict that the mass of longitudinally polarized W bosons and the mass of transversely polarized W bosons are different.

In those models, a difference in masses is also predicted to appear for the Z boson.

Is there a way that the existing data from the LHC, the LEP or the Tevatron can be used to check this prediction? Or maybe it has already been checked?

share|cite|improve this question
Hi Clara, and welcome to Physics Stack Exchange! Excellent question :-) I'm not very familiar with the models you're talking about, so I could only speculate at an answer, but I do hope someone knowledgeable comes along to answer this. – David Z Mar 11 '12 at 6:12
Please give a reference to ''Some higgsless unified models of particle physics predict'' – Arnold Neumaier Mar 11 '12 at 11:10
It is hard enough to measure the mass of the W since there are always missing neutrals in its decay, so I would not expect an experiment to be easy. The Z is a different story and somebody might be intrigued to check polarisations versus mass. In any case if a large mass difference existed one would have seen a secondary peak when scanning the… – anna v Mar 11 '12 at 11:38
Anna, but polarization changes continuously, so one would expect a smooth superposition of Gaussians, not a secondary peak. To see two distinct peaks, one would need to separate exact longitudinal and exact transversal polarization only, leaving out all the intermediate orientations. Is that possible? – Clara Mar 11 '12 at 11:50
If there were a large mass difference in the two polarizations it would show as a bump, since each individual Z would be of a specific polarization, fixed for that Z once produced. Take Z going to e+e-. It will have one specific pollarisation, it is a particle. – anna v Mar 11 '12 at 13:31

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.