Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm reading John Taylor's Classical Mechanics book and I'm at the part where he's deriving the Euler-Lagrange equation.

Here is the part of the derivation that I didn't follow:

enter image description here

I don't get how he goes from 6.9 to 6.10 by partial-differentiating the term inside the integral. If this is allowed, I was probably missed my calculus class the day it was covered. Can someone tell me more about this? Which part of calculus is this from?

share|improve this question
    
Be sure to check out the 'in popular culture' section of the wikipedia entry on differentiating under the integral sign for the anecdote about Feynman. Apparently, it is a long-standing problem that this powerful tool is not typically taught in introductory calculus classes. –  kleingordon Mar 10 '12 at 5:23
2  
@kleingordon interesting. It was never taught to us either, but our teacher used it to solve a sum in a beautiful manner. Fortunately, he gave a quick intuitive explanation when he realised that none of us knew it. I guess the rule is so obvious to some that they forget to teach it. –  Manishearth Mar 10 '12 at 5:32
2  
@Manishearth, I agree that it seems like a pretty obvious thing to do (at least in the simple case when the limits aren't functions of your variable), but often enough in math doing something that seems obvious can get you into trouble, especially when you're relatively inexperienced. I think there should be a major effort to put this into the standard calc curriculum. –  kleingordon Mar 10 '12 at 5:37
    
Well, now I know for certain that I'm not going to be a Feynmann. :( –  Joebevo Mar 10 '12 at 5:39
    
Huh, interesting, I never realized that this was a common misunderstanding. Good question Joebevo :-) –  David Z Mar 11 '12 at 6:20
show 2 more comments

1 Answer 1

It's known as the Leibniz integral rule. As long as $\alpha$ is not the variable being integrated over, then $$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}\alpha}\int f(x,\alpha) \mathrm{d}x=\int\frac{\partial f(x,\alpha)}{\partial \alpha}\mathrm{d}x$$

$x$ will not be present outside the integral anyways (due to limits of the integral). As it is, while differentiating wrt $\alpha$, $x$ is constant. So it becomes a partial derivative inside.

You may want to check out the proof and more complicated forms (involving limits as functions of $\alpha$) on the linked wiki page.

share|improve this answer
    
It's not that intuitive to me, but I can see that it works by plugging in simple functions. Thanks. –  Joebevo Mar 10 '12 at 6:06
1  
Don't worry, I hated it too at first :) –  Manishearth Mar 10 '12 at 6:24
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.