Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

From Purcell's Electricity and Magnetism

A spectacular conclusion of one of the popular exhibitions of the time was likely to be the electrification of a boy suspended by many silk threads from the rafters; his hair stood on end and sparks could be drawn from the tip of his nose.

(pp 88 of second edition)

It sounds as if this wasn't something that hurt the boy in the act, but if there are sparks, there must be significant current running through his body, right? Were the sparks simply too small to cause serious damage, or is there a reason that drawing sparks from the boy doesn't affect his physiology?

share|improve this question
    
Were they drawing sparks continuously? If not, it's only a static shock. I used to wear socks, shuffle around the house, and touch my sister to give her a shock. Harmless. Hurts, though. And a pretty high voltage. But it's only fleeting, so it's harmless. –  Manishearth Mar 1 '12 at 1:40
    
By continuously I mean completely continuously. A spark every second is fine, but it would hurt depending on the magnitude. –  Manishearth Mar 1 '12 at 5:23
    
It is the power behind it, it is high voltage built up but little power.the first generators were triboelectric en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatic_generator, high voltages small currents. –  anna v Mar 1 '12 at 7:36

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.