Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Two objects go in against each other, and then they collide, will object 1, exerting force 1, necessarily get on it a reaction equal in magnitude and opposite in direction?

EDIT:- In my book it only says "for every action there is always opposed an equal reaction". But after reading on Newton's third law on Wikipedia, I read this "The action and the reaction are simultaneous"; it's not an intuitive statement (it sounds more like an object gets a reaction after an action), but anyway that solves my problem. If you care to explain how the two forces are always simultaneous please do.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

It sounds like you may have been confused because intuitively, you would think a reaction occurs after the action, in response to it. As you've found, that is not what Newton's third law is saying. The reaction force is not a response to the action. For this reason, some people don't like the statement "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction."

A better statement of Newton's third law is to say that forces always occur in pairs. It is impossible for object A to exert a force on object B without object B also exerting a force on object A. The two forces are simultaneous, of equal magnitude, and in opposite directions.

Mathematically, this is stated as

$$\mathbf{F}_{AB} = -\mathbf{F}_{BA}$$

share|cite|improve this answer

In Newtonian mechanics, yes. This is Newton's third law, as Chris Gerig pointed out in the comments.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.