Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am facing problem in calculating the value of given Clebsch–Gordan coefficients representing the coupled angular momenta of two-particle system. For example

$$\begin{pmatrix}2 & 1 & 2 \\ 1 & -1 & 0\end{pmatrix}$$

In the book it is first expanded in three parts like

$$\begin{pmatrix}2 & 1 & 2 \\ 0 & 0 & 0\end{pmatrix},\begin{pmatrix}2 & 1 & 2 \\ 1 & -1 & 0\end{pmatrix},\begin{pmatrix}2 & 1 & 2 \\ -1 & 1 & 0\end{pmatrix}$$

I am really very much confused that which symmetry property should use?

I know here orthonormality condition of coefficient applied here. But why here in the second row values are first $\begin{pmatrix}0 & 0 & 0\end{pmatrix}$ then $\begin{pmatrix}1 & -1 & 0\end{pmatrix}$ and then $\begin{pmatrix}-1 & 1 & 0\end{pmatrix}$? Please help! I will be thankful to you.

share|cite|improve this question
A little bit more of information. Please check your syntax. If you put everything in braces it looks like Wigner 3j symbols. They are another representation of a CG coefficients but I doubt your using 3j syntax. Redefine your question in a proper $|(J, M) j_1, m_1, j_2, m_2>$ basis – Alex1167623 Mar 1 '12 at 9:08

If you look on the Wikipedia entry for the Wigner 3-j symbols:

You will see that those symbols are related combining two spin states to get a third state:

$ \begin{pmatrix} j_1 \, j_2 \, j_3\\ m_1 \, m_2 \, m_3 \end{pmatrix} \equiv \frac{(-1)^{j_1-j_2-m_3}}{\sqrt{2j_3+1}} \langle j_1 m_1 j_2 m_2 | j_3 \, {-m_3} \rangle.$

Ignoring any coefficients, the interpretation is that the first two columns are the states that are added and the third column is the resulting state.

This tells us a few things. First, it tells us that the sum of the bottom row must equal 0. This is just conservation of angular momentum (in the z-direction). Thus, $m_1 + m_2 = m_3$.

So, back to your original question, the original 3-j symbol can be expanded into a sum of other symbols. Physically, this means: given two particles of fixed total spin (in this case, spin 1 and spin 2), how can I add them together to get an effective state of total spin 2?

Focusing only on the bottom row, which represents the z-direction angular momenta of the particles, the first entry can be 2, 1, 0, -1, -2 (the possible z-direction spins of a spin-2 particle) and the second entry in the second row can only be 1, 0, -1 (it's a spin-1 particle). But these two must add up to 0. So, given those choices, there are only three combinations that work: 0 + 0 = 0, 1 + -1 = 0, -1 + 1 = 0. This is why only those three symbols are listed: all others vanish.

The physical interpretation is: given a spin-2 particle and a spin-1 particle, I can combine them together to form an effective spin-2 particle with 0 angular momenta in the z-direction. To do this, I only need 3 terms in the sum, and the value of the 3-j symbols gives you the coefficients of each term in the sum.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.