Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let's say there is a fin that is 1mm thick, extends 8mm from the surface, and is 10 mm wide. The fin is exposed to a moving fluid. Can we assume the adiabatic tip condition and use the characteristic, "Corrected", length for calculations?

share|cite|improve this question
Using the corrected length does not assume an adiabatic tip. The corrected length is intended to make a non-adiabatic tip fit into equations used for an adiabatic tip. Not using the corrected length – i.e., taking $L_c=L\ $ – means assuming an adiabatic tip. – rdhs Feb 26 '12 at 5:47

The error due to assuming the tip is adiabatic is approximately given by the area ratio of the tip to the total surface area of the fin. That is, $error = 8 mm^2 / 160 mm^2 $.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.