Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Four rods A, B, C, D of same length and material but of different radii r, 2r , 3r and 4r respectively are held between two rigid walls. The temperature of all rods is increased by same amount. If the rods do not bend, then which of these are correct:

  1. The stress in the rods are in the ratio 1 : 2 : 3 : 4.
  2. The force on the rod exerted by the wall are in the ratio 1 : 2 : 3 : 4.
  3. The energy stored in the rods due to elasticity are in the ratio 1 : 2 : 3 : 4.
  4. The strains produced in the rods are in the ratio 1 : 2 : 3 : 4.

Four rods A, B, C, D of same length and material => Same Youngs Modulus, Same coefficient of linear expansion, Same Length.

Also, The temperature of all rods is increased by same amount.

Before answering the above question I've few other questions:

  1. Suppose rods were not held between two rigid walls. Then there would have been change in length. In that case, would there be stress? Intuitively it feels like stress would be zero, as there seems to be no restoring forces developed. But Stress = Youngs modulus * strain. Strain is definitely not zero. So, stress should not be zero. Confused!

  2. No say, rods were held between two rigid walls. Assuming rods are not bending. There length will not change. So, strain would be zero. Stress = Youngs modulus * strain. So, Stress must be zero. But intuitively it seems there will be stress, because there will be restoring forces in the rod pushing walls away. Again confused!

Now coming back to the original problem. The above two confusions are causing trouble. But just going by intuition. There will be stress developed even though there is no strain. But stress = Restoring Force/Area. Here areas for all rods are different pi*r^2, because r is different. But Restoring force is same. So, the ratio must be 1/1 : 1/4 : 1/9 : 1/16. Right?

Surprisingly answers are 3,4. There is lot of confusion. Kindly clarify

share|improve this question
    
I love this question. It shows that the OP is putting thought into his formulas, not just repeating algorithms. –  André Neves May 19 at 1:40

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Your confusion lies within your perception of natural length in the Young's modulus formula. When we say strain=$\Delta L/L$, the $L$ refers to the natural length of the rod at a given temperature. So, if the rod is not clamped, and we increase the temperature, there is no deviation from natural length at that temperature (as we can define natural length of a rod at a temperature by calling it "the length of the rod at that temperature in the absence of any other influences"), so strain is zero. Stress is obviously zero.

If the rod is clamped, its length stays $L_0$, but it's natural length becomes $L_0(1+\alpha\Delta T)$, so the $\Delta L$ comes from the fact that its natural length has changed but its length is constant.

Summing up, in your Young's modulus formula, use strain=$\Delta L_T/L_T$, where $\Delta L_T$ is $|L_0-L_T|$, $L_T=L_0(1+\alpha\Delta T)$, and $L_0$ is length at a reference temperature.

Use this to solve the problem now.

share|improve this answer

protected by Qmechanic Dec 24 '13 at 9:17

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.