Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why is string theory in 10 or 26 dimension not divergent? Due to the high number of spacetime dimension (10 or 26) it should have a lot of UV divergencies of the form $ \int k^{n}dk $ and gravity within the approach of the string theory should be non-renormalizable too, or shouldn't it?

share|cite|improve this question
Lubos Motl has a blog post about the finiteness of pertubative superstring amplitudes here that includes several references to the subject. – Qmechanic Feb 15 '12 at 21:08
... I assume You are honestly interested in what You are asking such that my +1 was not a premature slip of my mouse ;-) – Dilaton Feb 15 '12 at 22:17
You must remember that string theory trades in an infinite tower of particles for a worldsheet, and the final world-sheet sum is much milder and more nonlocal than any of the particle sums that go into it. The momentum integration is not unbounded, because high k fluctuations become worldsheet fluctuations, and at high energy they are infrared big. – Ron Maimon Apr 8 '12 at 6:31

Bosonic closed oriented string theory is divergent in flat space time, see for example Lecture 3 of D'Hoker in "Quantum Fields and Strings" Volume 2. The reason is the presence of the tachyon. To my knowledge for the NS-NS string finiteness is only known up to one loop and already difficult.

Edit: Apparently a little bit more is known for the superstring, see Lectures on Two-Loop Superstrings by D'Hoker and Phong. This seems to be the most recent result.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.