Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Related: How would a black hole power plant work?

I have put a bit of commentary enumerating my confusions in parentheses

I read in Black Holes and Time Warps (Kip Thorne), that quasars can generate their jets from four different processes. These all involved the accretion disk, but there was one which doesn't make quite as much sense. It was called the Blandford-Znajek process, and it involved magnetic field lines carrying current.

The process was visualized in two ways. A black hole, with magnetic field lines, is spinning. In the first visualisation (viewpoint actually), the magnetic field lines 'spin' along with the black hole, and nearby plasma is anchored onto the field lines by electrical forces (where did the electrical fields come from?). The plasma can slide along the field lines but not across them (why?). Since the field lines are spinning, centrifugal forces will fling them up and down the field lines, forming jets.

The other viewpoint is this, and it makes even less sense (to me that is, I haven't had a formal education in GR): The magnetic fields and the swirl of space generate a voltage difference across the field lines (Why? How?). The voltage carries current across the magnetic field lines (why are the field lines behaving like wires?). This current travels across plasma, which accelerates it, creating the jets.

Now the main thing that doesn't make sense, is that magnetic field lines are behaving like wires. Why would they? I suspect the answer lies hidden somewhere in the equivalence of EM waves in different frames, but I can't think up any convincing argument from that side.

If the answer involves GR equations, you don't need to solve it here (wouldn't make sense to me), but if you have to, just refer to the equation and what you did to it, along with the final result. Thanks!

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Thinking of magnetic field lines as rigid wires with tension (and also pressure, more on that later) is a great way to form intuition when dealing with fluids that have negligible resistivity - the behavior of such a system falls under the heading of ideal magnetohydrodynamics (ideal MHD), and I would definitely recommend consulting references on that.

You might already be familiar with the phenomenon of synchrotron radiation from electrons interacting with a magnetic field. As an electron moves in the field, it experiences an acceleration in the plane perpendicular to the magnetic field (flux) that can produce cyclical motion in that plane. If you consider a situation where the radius of the cyclical motion is small compared to other relevant length scales in the problem, then you can see how the electron might appear as though is "trapped" on the field line, as it continues to move freely in the direction parallel to the field line.

In addition to trapping particles on field lines, magnetic fields in highly conductive fluids have two other significant effects on the fluid dynamics: magnetic tension and magnetic pressure. Magnetic tension accounts for the restoring force that the magnetic field exerts when curvature is induced in the field lines. Magnetic pressure accounts for the restoring force to bunching lines together. Magnetic pressure is not hard to understand, since the magnetic energy density goes as the amplitude of the field squared, and bunching field lines together is equivalent to increasing the amplitude of the field. All of these statements can be handled rigorously by writing down equations for conservation of mass, momentum and energy for the fluid, and combining them with Maxwell's equations for the magnetic field and neglecting resistivity in the fluid (this is ideal MHD).

EDIT: I'm having trouble responding to comments, so I'll put some more information in here.

For a nice semi-technical illustration of how the Blandford Znajek mechanism operates, you might consider this article from Science: , which is unfortunately behind a pay wall but is often accessible from university computers.

The details of this mechanism are an active topic of research and are still being explored via numerical simulation and comparison to observations. The finer details of GR are unavoidable in this context. A high level explanation is that the geometry of the rotating black hole causes the field lines to have the highest curvature near the midplane, and this produces a pressure gradient that launches gas from the midplane out toward the poles

share|cite|improve this answer
Ok, I understand how it may be trapped along a field line, but what compels it to go up and only up? In the diagram I have, there is one field line carrying current up, and another field line carrying it back down. The circuit is completed by the black hole horizon and the plasma. I think I need a description from the astrophysics point of view.. – Manishearth Feb 13 '12 at 6:16
Ok, so theres no simple explanation for why the current goes up along a particular field line (if you can explain this from mhd or atrophysics, please do so.. It does not deem to be a 'detail' of the mechanism)? Thanks then.. – Manishearth Feb 13 '12 at 9:53

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.