Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let's say that there is a circular conical section that has diameter $D=.25x$ without any heat generation and I need to find the temperature distribution.

Originially I thought I could use the heat diffusivity equation at steady state to find the temperature distribution. The differential equation would be:


I am looking at the solution to the example in the book and they use Fourier's Law $$q_{x}=-kA\frac{dT}{dx}$$ and their result is $T(x)=T_{1}-\frac{4q}{\pi a^{2}k}(\frac{1}{x_{1}}-\frac{1}{x_{2}})$

Why do they use one as opposed to the other? Will the two methods produce the same result?

The reason I ask is because they also provide a derivation for the temperature distribution of a plane wall with no heat generation and they use the heat diffusivity equation

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Both methods should thus give you the same result. The diffusion equation for heat can be derived from Fourier's law.

For a one-dimensional problem, you can do that easily yourself, by taking a inifinitesimal part of the rod of size $dx$ and realizing that $q_x$ at either side of this part should be the same (since there is no heat source or sink in this piece). Taking the limit for $dx \rightarrow 0$, will give you the diffusion equation. If your problem becomes more complex, the diffusion equation will be easier to solve.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.