Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

One book defines the shear stress $\tau$ of a (Newtonian) fluid as

$$\tau = \eta \frac{\partial v}{\partial r} $$

where $\eta$ is the viscosity. There is not much context, so I've made some guesses. Are my following assumptions correct?

  • $v$ is the velocity of the flow line, parallel to the wall.
  • $r$ is the distance of the flow line from the wall.
  • the flow must be laminar for the above to hold. (Otherwise, what would $v$ mean?)
  • the "wall" must be a tube for the above to hold. (Otherwise, what would $r$ mean?)
share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Your assumptions are correct (but $r$ is often defined as the distance from the pipe centerline). However, this is a very specific case: laminar pipe flow.

In general, the stress will be a tensiorial quantity, defined as

$$ \tau_{ij}= \eta \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_j}$$

which is true for turbulent flow, in arbitrary geometries. Where $i,j$ are in the range ${1,2,3}$ for the $x,y,z$ components.

For your case, you only have velocities in the streamwise direction, and variations in the radial direction, which makes all other components zero.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.