Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Two very large, nonconducting plastic sheets, each 10.0 cm thick, carry uniform charge densities $\sigma_1, \sigma_2, \sigma_3$ and $\sigma_4$ on their surfaces (the four surfaces are in the following order $\sigma_1, \sigma_2, \sigma_3$ and $\sigma_4$ going from left to right). These surface charge densities have the values $\sigma_1 =-6, \sigma_2 = +5, \sigma_3 = +2$ and $\sigma_4 = +4$ all in C/(m*m).

A) Use Gauss's law to find the magnitude of the electric field at the point A, 5.00 cm from the left face of the left-hand sheet.

B) Find the magnitude of the electric field at the point B, from the inner surface of the right-hand sheet.

C) Find the magnitude of the electric field at the point C, in the middle of the right-hand sheet.

So in the book the author derives an equation for this kind of situation, and there is actually an example in the text, but the example is for a plate that has only one charge and not two like this one. Anyways, the equation is $E=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}$.

I got question A) right by just adding up the electric field due to all the charges, namely $E_{net}=\frac{\sigma_2}{2\epsilon_0} +\frac{\sigma_3}{2\epsilon_0}+\frac{\sigma_4}{2\epsilon_0}-\frac{\sigma_1}{2\epsilon_0}$, but I am not sure about B) and C), would they be the same? When I drew the electric field vectors, going towards the negative side and away from the positive one, I couldn't really figure out what direction the net vector would be pointing to.

diagram of problem

share|cite|improve this question

closed as too localized by Qmechanic Feb 15 '13 at 15:32

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Hi Daniel, and welcome to Physics Stack Exchange! Any chance you can post an image of the electric field vectors you drew, and showing the positioning of points B and C? – David Z Jan 27 '12 at 23:49
It won't let me, it says I need to have at reputation of at least 10 to post images. – Hiro Jan 28 '12 at 0:14
Oh, right, sorry about that. If you can get the image online somewhere, just post the URL and someone with higher reputation can edit it into your post for you. – David Z Jan 28 '12 at 0:23
up vote 0 down vote accepted

The key to solving this question is applying Gauss' Law through drawing Gaussian surfaces. The example in your book probably reached the result you give by drawing a cylinder perpendicularly through a charged sheet. If not, see the explanation here under the section "Field of an Infinite Plane Sheet of Charge". You need to understand how exactly this gives you the result $E=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}$

For this particular geometry, the following Gaussian surfaces should be used:

The red rectangle is the surface you should use to find the field at A. The two green rectangles should be used to find the field at B. And the two blue rectangles should be used to find the field at C. Note that each rectangle in fact represents a cylindrical Gaussian surface.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.