Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is a CFT$_2$ always holomorphically factorizable? I had this idea because that's what we usually see is taken in string theory e.g (taking $z$ and $\bar{z}$ as independent variables). E.g. Ginsparg explains in "Applied Conformal field theory" paper page 7, that due to the emergence of Virasoro symmetry group, it is "useful" to consider them as independent, though he said that we should take $z^*=\bar{z}$ later according to our convenience. But it would be nice to understand what's going on. E.g, does holomorphic factorizability becomes an essential in some CFT$_2$'s? E.g. if we are considering some field theory in AdS$_3$ (no Chern Simons term say), should we expect the boundary CFT to be factorizable (its then not a pure gravity any more)?

share|cite|improve this question
What is your definition of the term "holomorphically factorizable"? I think the common definition has something to do with the partition function of the theory factoring into a sum over terms that can be written as products of holomorphic and anti-holomorphic pieces. – joshphysics Nov 27 '13 at 4:25

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.