Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am a math student with some interests in physics. I picked up a book called "A First Course in General Relativity", and I am confused on the second page. I am assuming by notation or convention.

The chapter is on special relativity, and at this point they are just talking about how measurements of velocity are invariant by a constant. That is $v'(t) = v(t) - V$, where $v(t)$ is a measurement by one observer and $v'(t)$ is a measurement by another observer whose relative velocity to the original is $V$.

Then it says Newton's second law is unaffected by this replacement. It offers as an explanation, $$a' - dv'/dt = d(v - V)/dt = dv/dt = a.$$

I am confused in how this explains anything. Also as I read the notation, shouldn't $a' = dv'/dt$? So $a' - dv'/dt = 0$. Also the first equality is confusing, since $v' = v - V$, I thought, so using that replacement I get $$a' - dv'/dt = a' - d(v - V)/dt.$$ And I don't see where they go from there.

I assume I am just misunderstanding what is meant by a particular variable. Can anyone help shed some light on my confusion on this point? Thanks.


I think I am being confused by a typo, replacing the $=$ with $-$ seems to make things make sense. I probably should have seen that.

$$a' = dv'/dt = d(v - V)/dt = dv/dt = a.$$

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

I think you are correct that it's simply a typo. Replacing the "-" with an "=" does indeed make the equation make sense.

share|cite|improve this answer

What you describe is a numerical invariance of the second law in the classical mechanics: not only the Newton equation has the same form $m\vec{a}=\vec{F}$, but also the left-hand and the right-hand side parts are numerically the same in different reference frames. I mean the Galilean transformations. Rotations, for example, preserve the form of equations, but change the numerical values of vector projections to the new axes.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.